Quantum Theory

References

Useful Links

References

[1-1]

Geometric and Algebraic Topological Methods in Quantum Mechanics, G. Giachetta, L. Mangiarotti, G. Sardanashvily, arXiv:math-ph/0410040, 2004.

[1-2]

Quantum Mechanics, L. I. Schiff, McGraw-Hill, 1968. Third Edition.

[2-1]

Fundamentals of Optics, F. A. Jenkins, H. E. White, McGraw-Hill, 1981.

[2-2]

Principles of Optics, M. Born, E. Wolf, Pergamon Press, 1959.

[3-1]

Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Einstein, Albert, Podolsky, Boris, Rosen, Nathan, Phys. Rev. 47 (1935) 777-780.

[4-1]

Quantum Mechanics, is it magic, M. Ferrero, D. Salgado, J.L. Sanchez-Gomez, arXiv:0804.4216, 2008.

[4-2]

Elements of Group Theory, F. J. Yndurain, arXiv:0710.0468, 2007. lecture notes.

[4-3]

CPT and Quantum Mechanics Tests with Kaons, Jose Bernabeu et al., arXiv:hep-ph/0607322, 2006.

[4-4]

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics, V. Dorobantu, arXiv:physics/0602145, 2006.

[4-5]

Open Quantum Dynamics: Complete Positivity and Entanglement, F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B19 (2005) 3063, arXiv:quant-ph/0507271.

[4-6]

Generalizations of Quantum Mechanics, Philip Pearle, Antony Valentini, arXiv:quant-ph/0506115, 2005. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Physics.

[4-7]

Between classical and quantum, N.P. Landsman, arXiv:quant-ph/0506082, 2005. Elsevier's Handbook of the Philosophy of Physics.

[4-8]

Studies in the Theory of Quantum Games, Azhar Iqbal, arXiv:quant-ph/0503176, 2005.

[4-9]

The role of the rigged Hilbert space in Quantum Mechanics, R. de la Madrid, arXiv:quant-ph/0502053, 2005.

[4-10]

Tunnelling times: An elementary introduction, G. Privitera, G. Salesi, V.S. Olkhovsky, E. Recami, arXiv:quant-ph/0412146, 2004.

[4-11]

The Casimir effect: Recent controversies and progress, Kimball A. Milton, J. Phys. A37 (2004) R209, arXiv:hep-th/0406024.

[4-12]

Noncommutative Spacetime and Quantum Mechanics, Jaroslaw Wawrzycki, arXiv:quant-ph/0404028, 2004.

[4-13]

Quantum Gravity Phenomenology, Giovanni Amelino-Camelia, arXiv:physics/0311037, 2003.

[4-14]

Quantum Beat Spectroscopy in Chemistry, R.T. Carter, J.R. Huber, Chem. Soc. Rev. 29 (2000) 305-314. http://www.rsc.org/ej/CS/2000/a900724e.pdf.

[4-15]

Theory of Electron Interference Experiments, D. Gabor, Rev. Mod. Phys. 28 (1956) 260.

[5-1]

Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a review, J. Eisert, M. Cramer, M.B. Plenio, (2008), arXiv:0808.3773.

[5-2]

Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics versus Quantum Field Theories, Antonio Pineda, arXiv:0705.4224, 2007. 42nd Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High-Energy Hadronic Interactions, La Thuile, March 2007.

[5-3]

Quantum Mechanics with Neutral Kaons, A. Bramon, G. Garbarino, B. C. Hiesmayr, Acta Phys. Polon. B38 (2007) 2763-2776, arXiv:hep-ph/0703152. Effective Theories of Colour and Flavour: from EURODAPHNE to EURIDICE, Kazimierz (Poland), August 24-27, 2006.

[5-4]

Two theorems of Jhon Bell and Communication Complexity, Guruprasad Kar, arXiv:quant-ph/0504191, 2005. Quantum Information,computation and Communication (QICC-2005), IIT Kharagpur,India,February 2005.

[5-5]

Foundations of Probability and Physics-3: Preface of Proceedings and Round Table on Quantum Foundations and Computing, Andrei Khrennikov, arXiv:quant-ph/0504109, 2005. AIP Conference.

[5-6]

Quantum thermodynamics: thermodynamics at the nanoscale, A.E. Allahverdyan, R. Balian, Th.M. Nieuwenhuizen, arXiv:cond-mat/0402387, 2004. Physics of Quantum Electronics (PQE2004), Snowbird.

[5-7]

Quantum Imaging and Metrology, Hwang Lee, Pieter Kok, Jonathan P. Dowling, arXiv:quant-ph/0306113, 2003. Sixth International Conference on Quantum Communication, Measurement and Computing.

[5-8]

Quantum logic. A brief outline, Karl Svozil, arXiv:quant-ph/9902042, 1999.

[5-9]

The Discovery of Squeezed States - In 1927, Michael Martin Nieto, arXiv:quant-ph/9708012, 1997. 5th International Conference on Squeezed States and Uncertainty Relations.

[6-1]

The neutron interferometer as a device for illustrating the strange behavior of quantum systems, Greenberger, Daniel M., Rev. Mod. Phys. 55 (1983) 875-905.

[7-1]

Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics and the measurement problem, Genovese, M., Adv.Sci.Lett. 3 (2010) 249-258, arXiv:1002.0990.

[7-2]

An Introduction to consistent quantum theory, Hohenberg, Pierre C., Rev.Mod.Phys. 82 (2010) 2835-2844, arXiv:0909.2359.

[7-3]

The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics, Cramer, John G., Rev. Mod. Phys. 58 (1986) 647-687.

[7-4]

The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, L. E. Ballentine, Rev. Mod. Phys. 42 (1970) 358.

[8-1]

Objective and Subjective Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics, Leslie Ballentine, arXiv:0710.5945, 2007. Vaxjo, Sweden, 11 June 2007.

[8-2]

What Connects Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics?, James B. Hartle, arXiv:quant-ph/0305089, 2003. Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics, Center for Frontier Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, September 24-27, 2002.

[9-1]

Realism and the physical world, A.J. Leggett, Rep. Prog. Phys. 71 (2008) 022001.

[10-1]

Quantum Zeno Effect, Mikhail Lemeshko, Bretislav Friedrich, arXiv:0903.4560, 2009.

[10-2]

Decay Theory of Unstable Quantum Systems, Fonda, L., Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., Rept. Prog. Phys. 41 (1978) 587-631.

[11-1]

Zeno meets modern science, Silagadze, Z. K., Acta Phys. Polon. B36 (2005) 2887-2930, arXiv:physics/0505042.

[12-1]

Perspectives on the quantum Zeno paradox, W. M. Itano, arXiv:quant-ph/0612187, 2006. Sudarshan Symposium, Univ. of Texas, November 2006.

[13-1]

Weak measurements in quantum mechanics, Lajos Diosi, arXiv:quant-ph/0505075, 2005.

[13-2]

An introduction to entanglement measures, Martin B. Plenio, S. Virmani, Quant. Inf. Comput. 7 (2007) 1-51, arXiv:quant-ph/0504163.

[13-3]

How the Quantum Universe Became Classical, J.J. Halliwell, arXiv:quant-ph/0501119, 2005.

[13-4]

Decoherence, the Measurement Problem, and Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics, Maximilian Schlosshauer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 (2004) 1267, arXiv:quant-ph/0312059.

[13-5]

Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical - REVISITED, Wojciech H. Zurek, arXiv:quant-ph/0306072, 2003.

[13-6]

Dynamical Reduction Models, Bassi, Angelo, Ghirardi, Gian Carlo, Phys. Rep. 379 (2003) 257, arXiv:quant-ph/0302164.

[13-7]

Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical, Zurek, Wojciech Hubert, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 715-775.

[13-8]

Collapse Models, Pearle, Philip M., arXiv:quant-ph/9901077, 1999.

[13-9]

Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics, Omnes, R., Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 (1992) 339-382.

[13-10]

The dissipative brain, Giuseppe Vitiello, arXiv:q-bio.OT/0409037, 20q-.

[14-1]

Entanglement, Bell Inequalities and Decoherence in Particle Physics, Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Lect. Notes Phys. 689 (2006) 1, arXiv:quant-ph/0410028. Quantum Coherence in Matter: from Quarks to Solids, 42. Internationale Universitatswochen fur Theoretische Physik, Schladming, Austria, Feb. 28 - March 6, 2004.

[15-1]

Some Open Problems in Quantum Information Theory, O. Krueger, R.F. Werner, arXiv:quant-ph/0504166, 2005. http://www.imaph.tu-bs.de/qi/problems/.

[15-2]

The Physics of Information, Christoph Adami, arXiv:quant-ph/0405005, 2004.

[15-3]

Is Quantum Search Practical?, George F. Viamontes, Igor L. Markov, John P. Hayes, arXiv:quant-ph/0405001, 2004.

[15-4]

An Introduction to Logical Operations on Classical and Quantum Bits, F.L. Marquezino, R.R. Mello Junior, arXiv:physics/0404134, 2004.

[15-5]

Considerations on Classical and Quantum Bits, F.L. Marquezino, R.R. Mello Junior, arXiv:physics/0404133, 2004.

[15-6]

Introduction to Quantum Computation, Ashok Chatterjee, arXiv:quant-ph/0312111, 2003.

[15-7]

Dreams versus Reality: Plenary Debate Session on Quantum Computing, D. Abbott, arXiv:quant-ph/0310130, 2003.

[15-8]

Quantum Computation explained to my Mother, P. Arrighi, arXiv:quant-ph/0305045, 2003.

[15-9]

Quantum Computational Logics. A Survey, M. L. Dalla Chiara, R. Giuntini, R. Leporini, arXiv:quant-ph/0305029, 2003.

[15-10]

Decoherence, Control, and Symmetry in Quantum Computers, D. Bacon, arXiv:quant-ph/0305025, 2003. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2001.

[15-11]

Quantum Computing and Error Correction, A. M. Steane, arXiv:quant-ph/0304016, 2003.

[15-12]

Shor's Algorithm for Factoring Large Integers, C. Lavor, L. R. U. Manssur, R. Portugal, arXiv:quant-ph/0303175, 2003.

[15-13]

Mathematical Models of Contemporary Elementary Quantum Computing Devices, G. Chen, D. A. Church, B.-G. Englert, M. S. Zubairy, arXiv:quant-ph/0303163, 2003.

[16-1]

Illustrating the concept of quantum information, Richard Jozsa, arXiv:quant-ph/0305114, 2003. Charles H. Bennett 60th Birthday Symposium.

[16-2]

Introduction to Quantum Computers and Quantum Algorithms, Christof Zalka, arXiv:quant-ph/0305053, 2003. "IX Seminaire Rhodanien de Physique" on "Physics of Entangled States" in Dolomieu, France, February 26 - March 2 2001.

[17-1]

Coherence Properties of Optical Fields, L. Mandel, E. Wolf, Rev. Mod. Phys. 37 (1965) 231.

[17-2]

Line Shape, R. J. Breene Jr., Rev. Mod. Phys. 29 (1957) 94.

[18-1]

Introduction to Quantum Optics, V. I. Man'ko, arXiv:quant-ph/9509018, 1995. Latin America Scool of Physics 1995.

[19-1]

Symmetries in QFT, K. M. Hamilton, J. F. Wheater, arXiv:hep-ph/0310065, 2003.

[20-1]

A review of Quantum Gravity at the Large Hadron Collider, Xavier Calmet, Mod. Phys. Lett. A25 (2010) 1553-1579, arXiv:1005.1805.

[20-2]

String Cosmology: A Review, Liam McAllister, Eva Silverstein, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 (2008) 565-605, arXiv:0710.2951.

[20-3]

Loop Quantum Gravity: An Inside View, Thomas Thiemann, Lect. Notes Phys. 721 (2007) 185-263, arXiv:hep-th/0608210.

[20-4]

Black Holes at Future Colliders and Beyond: a Topical Review, Greg Landsberg, J. Phys. G32 (2006) R337-R365, arXiv:hep-ph/0607297.

[20-5]

Quantum Cosmology, Martin Bojowald, arXiv:gr-qc/0603110, 2006.

[20-6]

Phenomenological Quantum Gravity, Dagny Kimberly, Joao Magueijo, Aip Conf. Proc. 782 (2005) 241, arXiv:gr-qc/0502110. Lectures given at XI BSCG.

[20-7]

How far are we from the quantum theory of gravity?, Smolin, Lee, arXiv:hep-th/0303185, 2003.

[35-62]

Why the quantum must yield to gravity, Christian, Joy, arXiv:gr-qc/9810078, 1998. .

[21-1]

Gravitons in Kaluza-Klein Theory, V H Satheesh Kumar, P K Suresh, arXiv:gr-qc/0605016, 2006.

[21-2]

Gravity, Geometry and the Quantum, Abhay Ashtekar, AIP Conf. Proc. 861 (2006) 3-14, arXiv:gr-qc/0605011. `Einstein Century' Conference, 15-22 July, Paris.

[22-1]

Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses, Genovese, Marco, Phys. Rept. 413 (2005) 319-396.

[22-2]

A Proposed Solution of the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics by a Hidden Variable Theory, Bohm, D., Bub, J., Rev. Mod. Phys. 38 (1966) 453-469.

[23-1]

First observation of quantum interference in the process : a test of quantum mechanics and CPT symmetry, KLOE (KLOE), Phys. Lett. B642 (2006) 315-321, arXiv:hep-ex/0607027.

[23-2]

Robust entanglement, H. Haeffner et al., arXiv:quant-ph/0508021, 2005.

[24-1]

A simple approach to test Leggett's model of nonlocal quantum correlations, Cyril Branciard et al., arXiv:0801.2241, 2008.
From the abstract: We present new inequalities for testing Leggett's model [37-32] of non-local quantum correlations.... The simplest of these inequalities is experimentally violated.

[24-2]

Experimental test of nonlocal realistic theories without the rotational symmetry assumption, Tomasz Paterek et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 210406, arXiv:0708.0813.
From the abstract: We analyze the class of nonlocal realistic theories that was originally considered by Leggett [37-32] and tested by us in a recent experiment [24-4].... Using polarization-entangled photon pairs, we exclude this broader class of nonlocal realistic models by experimentally violating a new Leggett-type inequality by 80 standard deviations.

[24-3]

Experimental Falsification of Leggett's Non-Local Variable Model, Cyril Branciard et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 210407, arXiv:0708.0584.
From the abstract: Our experimental data falsify Leggett's model and are in agreement with quantum predictions.

[24-4]

An experimental test of non-local realism, Simon Groeblacher et al., Nature 446 (2007) 871-875, arXiv:0704.2529.
From the abstract: In the experiment, we measure previously untested correlations between two entangled photons, and show that these correlations violate an inequality proposed by Leggett for non-local realistic theories. Our result suggests that giving up the concept of locality is not sufficient to be consistent with quantum experiments, unless certain intuitive features of realism are abandoned.

[24-5]

Realisation of Hardy's Thought Experiment, William T.M. Irvine, Juan F. Hodelin, Christoph Simon, Dirk Bouwmeester, arXiv:quant-ph/0410160, 2004.
From the article: We find a violation of the LHV (Local Hidden Variables) inequality by 12 standard deviations.

[24-6]

Experimental Bell Inequality Violation with an Atom and a Photon, D. L. Moehring, M. J. Madsen, B. B. Blinov, C. Monroe, arXiv:quant-ph/0406048, 2004.

[24-7]

Observation of Bell Inequality violation in B mesons, Go, A. (Belle), arXiv:quant-ph/0310192, 2003. Garda Lake Workshop 2003 "Mysteries, Puzzles and Paradoxes in Quantum Mechanics".

[24-8]

A first experimental test of de Broglie-Bohm theory against standard quantum mechanics, G. Brida, E. Cagliero, G. Falzetta, M.Genovese, M. Gramegna, C. Novero, J. Phys. B. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35 (2002) 4751, arXiv:quant-ph/0206196.
From the abstract: Our results confirm Quantum Mechanics contradicting De Broglie - Bohm predictions.

[25-1]

Experimental evidence for non-exponential decay in quantum tunnelling, S. R. Wilkinson et al., Nature 387 (1997) 575-577. http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~quantopt/papers/tunnelling.pdf.

[26-1]

Observation of the Quantum Zeno and Anti-Zeno effects in an unstable system, M. C. Fischer, B. Gutierrez-Medina, M. G. Raizen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 040402, arXiv:quant-ph/0104035.

[26-2]

Quantum Zeno effect, W.M. Itano, D.J. Heinzen, J.J. Bollinger, D.J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. A41 (1990) 2295-2300.

[27-1]

Unconditionally secure quantum key distribution over 50km of standard telecom fibre, C. Gobby, Z. L. Yuan, A. J. Shields, arXiv:quant-ph/0412173, 2004.

[27-2]

Quantum key distribution over 122 km of standard telecom fiber, C. Gobby, Z. L. Yuan, A. J. Shields, arXiv:quant-ph/0412171, 2004.

[28-1]

Applying quantum mechanics to macroscopic and mesoscopic systems, N. Poveda T., N. Vera-Villamizar, arXiv:1202.1876, 2012.

[28-2]

Solving the radial Dirac equations: a numerical odyssey, Richard R. Silbar, T. Goldman, Eur. J. Phys. 32 (2011) 217-233, arXiv:1001.2514.

[28-3]

Consequences of Dirac's theory of positrons, Heisenberg, W., Euler, H., Z. Phys. 98 (1936) 714-732, arXiv:physics/0605038.

[28-4]

Reversibility and Irreversibility within the Quantum Formalism, Tim Jacobs, Christian Maes, arXiv:quant-ph/0508041, 2005.

[28-5]

Can We Believe in a Purely Unitary Quantum Dynamics?, Fedor Herbut, arXiv:quant-ph/0507218, 2005.

[28-6]

Quantum Theory in Accelerated Frames of Reference, Mashhoon, Bahram, Lect. Notes Phys. 702 (2006) 112-132, arXiv:hep-th/0507157.

[28-7]

A Spacetime path formalism for relativistic quantum physics, Ed Seidewitz, J. Math. Phys. 47 (2006) 112302, arXiv:quant-ph/0507115.

[28-8]

Comment on "Quantum Theory Looks at Time Travel" by D. Greenberger and K. Svozil, John S. Wykes, arXiv:quant-ph/0507052, 2005.

[28-9]

Another Look at Quantum Teleportation, L. Vaidman, N. Erez, A. Retzker, arXiv:quant-ph/0507051, 2005.

[28-10]

Quantum mechanics and the time travel paradox, David T. Pegg, arXiv:quant-ph/0506141, 2005.

[28-11]

Entanglement from the Cosmic Microwave Background, Daniel Braun, arXiv:quant-ph/0505082, 2005.

[28-12]

Review of Equation of Motion in the Static Casimir Effect, Mohammad Mansouryar, arXiv:physics/0504144, 2005.

[28-13]

Coherence phenomena, V.I. Yukalov, arXiv:cond-mat/0504068, 2005.

[28-14]

The Aharonov-Bohm Effect in the Momentum Space, D. Dragoman, S. Bogdan, arXiv:quant-ph/0503172, 2005.

[28-15]

Postulates of quantum mechanics and phenomenology, D.A. Slavnov, arXiv:quant-ph/0503008, 2005.

[28-16]

Geometry of an Adiabatic Passage at a Level Crossing, Mateusz Cholascinski, arXiv:quant-ph/0502128, 2005.

[28-17]

Time reversal noninvariance in quantum mechanics and in nonlinear optics, V.A. Kuzmenko, arXiv:physics/0502110, 2005.

[28-18]

Coupled oscillators, entangled oscillators, and Lorentz-covariant harmonic oscillato, Y. S. Kim, Marilyn E. Noz, J. Opt. B Quant. Semiclass. Opt. 7 (2007) S458-S467, arXiv:quant-ph/0502096.

[28-19]

Note on Possibility of obtaining a non-relativistic proof of the spin-statistics theorem in the Galilean frame, Gabriel D. Puccini, Hector Vucetich, arXiv:quant-ph/0502048, 2005.

[28-20]

Second quantized formulation of geometric phases, Shinichi Deguchi, Kazuo Fujikawa, Phys. Rev. A72 (2005) 012111, arXiv:hep-th/0501166.

[28-21]

Multi-Instantons and Exact Results II: Specific Cases, Higher-Order Effects, and Numerical Calculations, Jean Zinn-Justin, Ulrich D. Jentschura, Annals Phys. 313 (2004) 269, arXiv:quant-ph/0501137.

[28-22]

Multi-Instantons and Exact Results I: Conjectures, WKB Expansions, and Instanton Interactions, Jean Zinn-Justin, Ulrich D. Jentschura, Annals Phys. 313 (2004) 197, arXiv:quant-ph/0501136.

[28-23]

Spin and Statistics in Nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics, II, Bernd Kuckert, Jens Mund, arXiv:quant-ph/0411197, 2004.

[28-24]

Comparing causality principles, Joe Henson, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 36 (2005) 519, arXiv:quant-ph/0410051.

[28-25]

Note on Non-relativistic proof of the spin-statistics connection in the Galilean frame, E. C. G. Sudarshan, Anil Shaji, arXiv:quant-ph/0409205, 2004.

[28-26]

Einstein's Boxes: Quantum Mechanical Solution, E.Yu. Bunkova, O.A. Khrustalev, O.D. Timofeevskaya, arXiv:quant-ph/0409126, 2004.

[28-27]

Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients for the Extended Quantum-Mechanical Poincar\'e Group and Angular Correlations of Decay Products, N.L. Harshman, N. Licata, Annals Phys. 317 (2005) 182, arXiv:hep-ph/0407299.

[28-28]

Helicity Basis for Spin 1/2 and 1, Valeri V. Dvoeglazov, J. L. Quintanar Gonzalez, Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math. 246 (2005) 137, arXiv:physics/0406033.

[28-29]

Quantum Mechanics without amplitudes, J. M. A. Figueiredo, arXiv:quant-ph/0406005, 2004.

[28-30]

Analytic Representation of The Dirac Equation, T. L. Gill, W. W. Zachary, arXiv:quant-ph/0405151, 2004.

[28-31]

Computing the wavefunction from trajectories: particle and wave pictures in quantum mechanics and their relation, Peter Holland, arXiv:quant-ph/0405145, 2004.

[28-32]

On the principles of quantum mechanics, Eijiro Sakai, arXiv:quant-ph/0405069, 2004.

[28-33]

Quantum Mechanics Another Way, J. Hancock, M. A. Walton, B. Wynder, arXiv:physics/0405029, 2004.

[28-34]

Time as an operator/observable in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, G. E. Hahne, arXiv:quant-ph/0404012, 2004.

[28-35]

Dramatic problems of Scattering Theory, Vladimir K. Ignatovich, arXiv:quant-ph/0403067, 2004.

[28-36]

Comment on "A mathematical theorem as a basis for the second law: Thomson"s formulation applied to equilibruim', Dan Solomon, arXiv:quant-ph/0403040, 2004.

[28-37]

Magneto-electro-optical properties of the quantum vacuum and Lorentz invariance, C Rizzo, G.L.J.A. Rikken, arXiv:physics/0403036, 2004.

[28-38]

Quantum mechanics and the equivalence principle, P. C. W. Davies, arXiv:quant-ph/0403027, 2004.

[28-39]

From Heisenberg to Goedel via Chaitin, C.S. Calude, M.A. Stay, arXiv:quant-ph/0402197, 2004.

[28-40]

Quantum mechanics from two physical postulates, Mohammad Mehrafarin, arXiv:quant-ph/0402153, 2004.

[28-41]

Some Novel Thought Experiments Involving Foundations of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Information, Omid Akhavan, arXiv:quant-ph/0402141, 2004.

[28-42]

Reply to "Non-relativistic proofs of the spin-statistics connection," by Shaji and Sudarshan, Murray Peshkin, arXiv:quant-ph/0402118, 2004.

[28-43]

Proper and Improper Separability, Christopher G. Timpson, Harvey R. Brown, arXiv:quant-ph/0402094, 2004.

[28-44]

An Elementary Derivation of the Harmonic Oscillator Propagator, L. Moriconi, arXiv:physics/0402069, 2004.

[28-45]

Quantum time ordering and degeneracy. I: Time ordering in quantum mechanics, J. H. McGuire et al., arXiv:quant-ph/0312179, 2003.

[28-46]

Quantum coherence: myth or fact?, Kae Nemoto, Samuel L. Braunstein, arXiv:quant-ph/0312108, 2003.

[28-47]

On Zurek's derivation of the Born rule, Maximilian Schlosshauer, Arthur Fine, arXiv:quant-ph/0312058, 2003.

[28-48]

Uncertainties in the Measurement of the Momentum and Position of an Electron, Kirk T. McDonald, arXiv:quant-ph/0312036, 2003.

[28-49]

Clock Synchronization based on Second-Order Quantum Coherence of Entangled Photons, Thomas B. Bahder, William M. Golding, arXiv:quant-ph/0311162, 2003.

[28-50]

A new way of defining unstable states, S. Kim, G. Ordonez, arXiv:physics/0311048, 2003.

[28-51]

The Equation of Motion of an Electron, R. F. O'Connell, arXiv:quant-ph/0311021, 2003.

[28-52]

Quantum Theory of Two-Photon Wavepacket Interference in a Beam Splitter, K. Wang, arXiv:quant-ph/0311011, 2003.

[28-53]

Quantum algorithms in group theory, M. Batty, S. L. Braunstein, A. J. Duncan, S. Rees, arXiv:quant-ph/0310133, 2003. To appear in "Interactions Between Logic, Group Theory and Computer Science", AMS Contemporary Math.

[28-54]

The Contextual Quantization and the Principle of Complementarity of Probabilities, A. Khrennikov, S. Kozyrev, arXiv:quant-ph/0310114, 2003.

[28-55]

Probabilities as Measures of Information, F. G. Perey, arXiv:quant-ph/0310073, 2003.

[28-56]

Rotational invariance and the spin-statistics theorem, P. O'Hara, Found. Phys. 33 (2003) 1349, arXiv:quant-ph/0310016.

[28-57]

Objectivity versus Completeness in Quantum Mechanics, C. Garola, S. Sozzo, arXiv:quant-ph/0309221, 2003.

[28-58]

Winning Vaidman's game without unspeakable information, A. Cabello, arXiv:quant-ph/0306075, 2003.

[28-59]

Schroedinger's cat and the clock: Lessons for quantum gravity, Robert Oeckl, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) 5371, arXiv:gr-qc/0306007.

[28-60]

Why can states and measurement outcomes be represented as vectors?, P. G. L. Mana, arXiv:quant-ph/0305117, 2003.

[28-61]

The Schrodinger-HJW Theorem, K. A. Kirkpatrick, arXiv:quant-ph/0305068, 2003.

[28-62]

Is quantum entanglement invariant in special relativity?, D. Ahn, H. J. Lee, S. W. Hwang, M. S. Kim, arXiv:quant-ph/0304119, 2003.

[28-63]

Orderings of Operators in Quantum Physics, K. Fujii, T. Suzuki, Mod. Phys. Lett. A19 (2004) 827-840, arXiv:quant-ph/0304094.

[28-64]

No spin-statistics connection in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, R. E. Allen, A. R. Mondragon, arXiv:quant-ph/0304088, 2003.

[28-65]

A new method for the solution of the Schrodinger equation, P. Amore, A. Aranda, A. De Pace, arXiv:quant-ph/0304043, 2003.

[28-66]

Unambiguous discrimination of mixed states, T. Rudolph, R. W. Spekkens, P. S. Turner, arXiv:quant-ph/0303071, 2003.

[28-67]

Everettian Rationality: defending Deutsch's approach to probability in the Everett interpretation, D. Wallace, arXiv:quant-ph/0303050, 2003.

[28-68]

An invitation to quantum tomography, Richard Gill, Madalin Guta, arXiv:quant-ph/0303020, 2003.

[28-69]

Relativistic, Causal Description of Quantum Entanglement and Gravity Theory, J. W. Moffat, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D13 (2004) 75, arXiv:quant-ph/0302061.

[28-70]

Quantum mechanics of damped systems, D. Chruscinski, arXiv:math-ph/0301024, 2003.

[28-71]

Measurement and Physical Content of Quantum Information, B. A. Grishanin, V. N. Zadkov, arXiv:quant-ph/0210190, 2002.

[28-72]

Conditional Density Matrix: Systems and Subsystems in Quantum Mechanics, V. V. Belokurov, O. A. Khrustalev, V. A. Sadovnichy, O. D. Timofeevskaya, arXiv:quant-ph/0210149, 2002.

[28-73]

Entanglement properties of composite quantum systems, K. Eckert et al., arXiv:quant-ph/0210107, 2002.

[28-74]

Open environments for quantum open systems, M. R. Gallis, arXiv:quant-ph/0210054, 2002.

[28-75]

Spin \& Statistics in Nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics, I, B. Kuckert, Phys. Lett. A322 (2004) 47, arXiv:quant-ph/0208151.

[28-76]

On Spin and Statistics in Quantum Mechanics, M. Peshkin, Phys. Rev. A67 (2003) 042102, arXiv:quant-ph/0207017.

[28-77]

Which causality? Differences between the trajectory and Copenhagen analyses of an impulsive perturbation, E. R. Floyd, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A14 (1999) 1111, arXiv:quant-ph/9708026.

[28-78]

Measurement of Longitudinal Coherence Lenghts in Particle Beams, H. J. Bernstein, F. E. Low, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 951.

[29-1]

Feynman and Squeezed States, Y. S. Kim, arXiv:0909.1578, 2009. 4th Feynman Festival and the 10th International Conference on Squeezed States and Uncertainty Relations (Olomouc, Czech Republic, June 2009).

[29-2]

Can quantum mechanics be an emergent phenomenon?, Blasone, Massimo, Jizba, Petr, Scardigli, Fabio, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 174 (2009) 012034, arXiv:0901.3907. 4th International Workshop DICE2008: From Quantum Mechanics through Complexity to Spacetime: The Role of Emergent Dynamical Structures, Castiglioncello, Italy, 22-26 Sep 2008.

[29-3]

Path Integrals, and Classical and Quantum Constraints, John R. Klauder, arXiv:quant-ph/0507222, 2005. PI2005.

[29-4]

Quantum information-flow, concretely, and axiomatically, Bob Coecke, arXiv:quant-ph/0506132, 2005. QPLII (2004) and QI-SPIE-2 (2004).

[29-5]

Chaos and Quantum Mechanics, Salman Habib et al., arXiv:quant-ph/0505085, 2005. 16th Florida Workshop in Nonlinear Astronomy and Physics.

[29-6]

Physical Principles and Properties of Unstable States, Piotr Kielanowski, arXiv:quant-ph/0312178, 2003. CFIF Workshop on Time Asymmetric Quantum Theory, July 23-26, 2003, Lisbon, Portugal.

[29-7]

Time of arrival with resonances: Beyond scattering states, Lucas Lamata, Juan Leon, arXiv:quant-ph/0312034, 2003. CFIF Workshop:" Time asymmetric quantum theory: The theory of resonances". Lisbon, July 2003.

[29-8]

Laws, Symmetries, and Reality, Jeeva Anandan, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 42 (2003) 1943, arXiv:quant-ph/0304109. Wigner Centennial Conference, Pecs, Hungary, 8-12 July, 2002.

[29-9]

Entanglement Criteria - Quantum and Topological, Louis H. Kauffman, Samuel J. Lomonaco Jr, arXiv:quant-ph/0304091, 2003. Spie Conference, Orlando, Fla, April 2003.

[29-10]

Coherence and the Clock, L. Stodolsky, arXiv:quant-ph/0303024, 2003. Time and Matter: An International Colloquium on the Science of Time (TAM 2002), Venice, Italy, 11-17 Aug 2002.

[29-11]

Lessons of coherence and decoherence: From neutrinos to SQUIDS, Stodolsky, L., arXiv:cond-mat/0203017, 2002. 22nd International Solvay Conference in Physics: The Physics of Communication, Delphi and Lamia, Greece, 24-30 Nov 2001.

[29-12]

Decoherence - Fluctuation Relation and Measurement Noise, Stodolsky, L., Phys. Rep. 320 (1999) 51, arXiv:quant-ph/9903072.

[30-1]

How Free Will Could Will, George Svetlichny, arXiv:1202.2007, 2012.

[30-2]

Quantum magic: A Skeptical perspective, Torrieri, Giorgio, arXiv:1107.3800, 2011.

[30-3]

Quantum Theory: Exact or Approximate?, Stephen L. Adler, Angelo Bassi, arXiv:0912.2211, 2009.

[30-4]

Difficulties with Collapse Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics, Casey Blood, arXiv:0808.3699, 2008.

[30-5]

Comment on "Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Is Incorrect", Markus Bier, arXiv:quant-ph/0509130, 2005.

[30-6]

Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Is Incorrect, Guang-Liang Li, Victor O. K. Li, arXiv:quant-ph/0509089, 2005.

[30-7]

Orthodox Quantum Mechanics Free from Paradoxes, Rodrigo Medina, arXiv:quant-ph/0508014, 2005.

[30-8]

Two-time interpretation of quantum mechanics, Yakir Aharonov, Eyal Y. Gruss, arXiv:quant-ph/0507269, 2005.

[30-9]

Dialogue Concerning Two Views on Quantum Coherence: Factist and Fictionist, Stephen D. Bartlett, Terry Rudolph, Robert W. Spekkens, arXiv:quant-ph/0507214, 2005.

[30-10]

Without the Born Rule, Richard A Mould, arXiv:quant-ph/0507170, 2005.

[30-11]

A Pragmatic Interpretation of Quantum Logic, Claudio Garola, arXiv:quant-ph/0507122, 2005.

[30-12]

Complementary Descriptions (PART II): A Set of Ideas Regarding the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Christian de Ronde, arXiv:quant-ph/0507114, 2005.

[30-13]

Complementary Descriptions (PART I): A Set of Ideas Regarding the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Christian de Ronde, arXiv:quant-ph/0507105, 2005.

[30-14]

Observables, Hans F. de Groote, arXiv:math-ph/0507019, 2005.

[30-15]

The Arrow of Time in Rigged Hilbert Space Quantum Mechanics, Robert C. Bishop, arXiv:quant-ph/0506184, 2005.

[30-16]

There is Neither Classical Bug with a Superluminal Shadow Nor Quantum Absolute Collapse Nor (Subquantum) Superluminal Hidden Variable, Vladan Pankovic, Milan Predojevic, Miodrag Krmar, Milan Radovanovic, arXiv:quant-ph/0504071, 2005.

[30-17]

On the uncertainty relations and quantum measurements: conventionalities, shortcomings, reconsiderations, S. Dumitru, arXiv:quant-ph/0504058, 2005.

[30-18]

On Wave-Particle Duality, W. De Baere, arXiv:physics/0504043, 2005.

[30-19]

Complementarity and Scientific Rationality, Simon Saunders, arXiv:quant-ph/0412195, 2004.

[30-20]

The Pondicherry interpretation of quantum mechanics: An overview, Ulrich Mohrhoff, arXiv:quant-ph/0412182, 2004.

[30-21]

Quantum mechanics needs no interpretation, L. Skala, V. Kapsa, arXiv:quant-ph/0412175, 2004.

[30-22]

Are atoms waves or particles?, Trevor W. Marshall, arXiv:quant-ph/0409203, 2004.

[30-23]

On the Complementarity Principle and the Uncertainty Principle, E. S. Guerra, arXiv:quant-ph/0409172, 2004.

[30-24]

Why Should we Interpret Quantum Mechanics?, Louis Marchildon, arXiv:quant-ph/0405126, 2004.

[30-25]

What object does the wave function describe?, Yuri A. Rylov, arXiv:physics/0405117, 2004.

[30-26]

Observing Quantum Systems, Gerhard Groessing, arXiv:quant-ph/0404030, 2004.

[30-27]

Consciousness and the Wigner's friend problem, Bernard d'Espagnat, arXiv:quant-ph/0402121, 2004.

[30-28]

Hydrodynamical interpretation of quantum mechanics: the momentum distribution, Yuri A. Rylov, arXiv:physics/0402068, 2004.

[30-29]

Phase Space Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Insight into the Measurement Problem, Daniela Dragoman, arXiv:quant-ph/0402021, 2004.

[30-30]

Probabilities from envariance?, Ulrich Mohrhoff, arXiv:quant-ph/0401180, 2004.

[30-31]

This elusive objective existence, Ulrich Mohrhoff, arXiv:quant-ph/0401179, 2004.

[30-32]

Understanding Deutsch's probability in a deterministic multiverse, Hilary Greaves, arXiv:quant-ph/0312136, 2003.

[30-33]

Does Consciousness Collapse the Wave Function, Dick J. Bierman, arXiv:physics/0312115, 2003.

[30-34]

There Is No Basis Ambiguity in Everett Quantum Mechanics, M. A. Rubin, arXiv:quant-ph/0310186, 2003.

[30-35]

Understanding Time and Causality is the Key to Understanding Quantum Mechanics, W. R. Wharton, arXiv:quant-ph/0310131, 2003.

[30-36]

Reality, measurement and locality in quantum field theory, Tommasini, Daniele, JHEP 07 (2002) 039, arXiv:hep-th/0205105.

[30-37]

Preparation and measurement: two independent sources of uncertainty in quantum mechanics, de Muynck, Willem M., Found. Phys. 30 (2000) 205-225, arXiv:quant-ph/9901010.

[30-38]

Interpreting the Quantum World, Peres, Asher, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 29 (1998) 611, arXiv:quant-ph/9711003.

[30-39]

The uncertainty principle and the statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics, Ballentine, L.E., Can.J.Phys. 47 (1969) 2417-2419.

[31-1]

Resonances, Unstable Systems and Irreversibility: Matter Meets Mind, Robert C. Bishop, arXiv:quant-ph/0506186, 2005. CFIF Workshop on TimeAsymmetric Quantum Theory: The Theory of Resonances, 23-26 July 2003, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisbon, Portugal and Quantum Structures Association Meeting, 7-22 July 2004, University of Denver.

[31-2]

The Ithaca interpretation of quantum mechanics, Mermin, N. David, Pramana 51 (1998) 549-565, arXiv:quant-ph/9609013. Tata Institute Golden Jubilee Workshop on Foundations of Quantum Theory, Bombay, India, 9-12 Sep 1996.

[32-1]

Relationalism vs. Bayesianism, Thomas Marlow, arXiv:gr-qc/0603015, 2006.

[32-2]

Quantum Bayesian methods and subsequent measurements, Filippo Neri, arXiv:quant-ph/0508012, 2005.

[32-3]

A Subjective Approach to Quantum Probability, E. Lehrer, E. Shmaya, arXiv:quant-ph/0503066, 2005.

[32-4]

On the Probabilistic Compatibility of Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, Thomas Marlow, arXiv:quant-ph/0501131, 2005.

[32-5]

What is Probability?, Simon Saunders, arXiv:quant-ph/0412194, 2004.

[32-6]

Why are probabilistic laws governing quantum mechanics and neurobiology?, H. Kroger, arXiv:quant-ph/0406098, 2004.

[32-7]

Probabilities from Envariance, W. H. Zurek, arXiv:quant-ph/0405161, 2004.

[32-8]

Unknown Quantum States and Operations, a Bayesian View, Christopher A. Fuchs, Ruediger Schack, arXiv:quant-ph/0404156, 2004.

[32-9]

On probability, indeterminism and quantum paradoxes, Bruno Galvan, arXiv:quant-ph/0404130, 2004.

[32-10]

On the relation between quantum mechanical probabilities and event frequencies, Charis Anastopoulos, arXiv:quant-ph/0403207, 2004.

[32-11]

Compatibility and probability, K. A. Kirkpatrick, arXiv:quant-ph/0403021, 2004.

[32-12]

Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more), Christopher A. Fuchs, arXiv:quant-ph/0205039, 2002.

[32-13]

Conditions for compatibility of quantum-state assignments, Carlton M. Caves, Christopher A. Fuchs, Rudiger Schack, Phys. Rev. A66 (2002) 062111.

[32-14]

Unknown Quantum States: the Quantum de Finetti Representation, Carlton M. Caves, Christopher A. Fuchs, Rudiger Schack, J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002) 4537.

[32-15]

Quantum Probabilities as Bayesian Probabilities, Carlton M. Caves, Christopher A. Fuchs, Rudiger Schack, Phys. Rev. A65 (2002) 022305.

[32-16]

Notes on a Paulian Idea: Foundational, Historical, Anecdotal and Forward-Looking Thoughts on the Quantum, Christopher A. Fuchs, arXiv:quant-ph/0105039, 2001.

[32-17]

Quantum Probability from Decision Theory?, Barnum, H., Caves, C. M., Finkelstein, J., Fuchs, C. A., Schack, R., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A456 (2000) 1175-1182, arXiv:quant-ph/9907024.

[32-18]

Quantum Theory of Probability and Decisions, Deutsch, David, arXiv:quant-ph/9906015, 1999.

[33-1]

Deviation from the exponential decay law in relativistic quantum field theory: the example of strongly decaying particles, Francesco Giacosa, Giuseppe Pagliara, Mod. Phys. Lett. A26 (2011) 2247-2259, arXiv:1005.4817.

[33-2]

Energy of unstable states at long times, Urbanowski, K., Piskorski, J., arXiv:0908.2219, 2009.

[33-3]

Quantum decay cannot be completely reversed. The 5% rule, Robert Alicki, arXiv:0807.2609, 2008.

[33-4]

General properties of the evolution of unstable states at long times, Urbanowski, K., Eur. Phys. J. D 54 (2009) 25, arXiv:0803.3188.

[33-5]

Comment on the Neutrino-Mixing Interpretation of the GSI Time Anomaly, Carlo Giunti, arXiv:0801.4639, 2008.
From the abstract: It is shown that neutrino mixing cannot explain the GSI time anomaly, refuting recent claims in this direction [,].

[33-6]

Kinematics and Quantum Field Theory of the Neutrino Oscillations Observed in the Time-modulated Orbital Electron Capture Decay in an Ion Storage Ring, Faber, Manfried, arXiv:0801.3262, 2008.

[33-7]

On the time-modulation of the K-shell electron capture decay of H-like ions produced by neutrino-flavour mixing, Ivanov, A. N., Reda, R., Kienle, P., arXiv:0801.2121, 2008.

[33-8]

Long time properties of the evolution of an unstable state, Urbanowski, K., Cent. Eur. J. Phys. 7 (2009) 696.

[33-9]

Relativistic resonances: Their masses, widths, lifetimes, superposition, and causal evolution, Bohm, Arno R., Sato, Yoshihiro, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 085018, arXiv:hep-ph/0412106.

[33-10]

Weisskopf-Wigner Decay Theory for the Energy-Driven Stochastic Schr\'odinger Equation, Stephen L. Adler, arXiv:quant-ph/0208123, 2002.

[33-11]

Van Hove's 'lambda^2 t' limit in nonrelativistic and relativistic field-theoretical models, Facchi, P., Pascazio, S., Chaos Solitons Fractals 12 (2001) 2777, arXiv:quant-ph/9910111.

[33-12]

The large time behaviour in quantum field theory and quantum chaos, Aref'eva, I. Ya., Volovich, I. V., Canadian Math. Soc. Conf. Proc. 29 (2000) 15-27, arXiv:quant-ph/9910109.

[33-13]

Quantum Decoherence and Higher Order Corrections to the Large Time Exponential Behaviour, Aref'eva, I. Ya., Volovich, I. V., Inf. Dim. Anal. Quant. Probab. Rel. Top. 3 (1999) 453-482, arXiv:quant-ph/9906022.

[33-14]

Weisskopf-Wigner model for wave packet excitation, Paloviita, Asta, Suominen, Kalle-Antti, Stenholm, Stig, J. Phys. B30 (1997) 2623, arXiv:quant-ph/9703011.

[33-15]

Time scale of short time deviations from exponential decay, Grotz, K., Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, H. V., Phys. Rev. C30 (1984) 2098-3000.

[33-16]

Nonobservability of nonexponential decay, Danos, M., Johnson, A. B., Phys. Rev. D30 (1984) 2692-2694.

[33-17]

Nonexponential decay law, Peres, Asher, Ann. Phys. 129 (1980) 33.

[33-18]

Quantum versus classical laws for sequential decay processes, Ghirardi, G. C., Omero, C., Weber, T., Nuovo Cim. A52 (1979) 443-457.

[33-19]

Quantum theory of sequential decay processes, Fonda, L., Ghirardi, G. C., Omero, C., Rimini, A., Weber, T., Phys. Rev. D18 (1978) 4757.

[33-20]

Pertinence of the Semigroup Law in the Theory of the Decay of an Unstable Elementary Particle, Twareque Ali, S., Fonda, L., Ghirardi, G. C., Nuovo Cim. A25 (1975) 134.

[33-21]

On the quantum foundations of the exponential decay law, Fonda, L., Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., Weber, T., Nuovo Cim. A15 (1973) 689-704.

[33-22]

Some remarks on the origin of the deviations from the exponential decay law of an unstable particle, Fonda, L., Ghirardi, G. C., Nuovo Cim. A7 (1972) 180-184.

[33-23]

Addendum to 'Some remarks on the origin of the deviations from the exponential decay law of an unstable particle', Fonda, L., Ghirardi, G. C., Nuovo Cim. A10 (1972) 850.

[33-24]

Contribution to the decay theory of unstable quantum systems. 2, Fonda, L., Ghirardi, G. C., Nuovo Cim. A6 (1971) 553-558.

[33-25]

Contribution to the decay theory of ustable quantum systems, Fonda, L., Ghirardi, G. C., Nuovo Cim. A67 (1970) 257-266.

[33-26]

Correspondence between unstable particles and poles in S matrix theory: The Exponential decay law, Calucci, G., Ghirardi, G. C., Phys. Rev. 169 (1968) 1339.

[34-1]

Non exponential decays of hadrons, Giuseppe Pagliara, Francesco Giacosa, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 4 (2011) 753-758, arXiv:1108.2782. Excited QCD 2011, Les Houches (France), 20-25 February 2011.

[35-1]

Measuring measurement, J.S. Lundeen et al., arXiv:0807.2444, 2008.

[35-2]

Feynman's quantum theory, H. D. Zeh, Eur. Phys. J. H36 (2011) 147-158, arXiv:0804.3348.

[35-3]

Phase transitions and quantum measurements, Armen E. Allahverdyan, Roger Balian, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen, arXiv:quant-ph/0508162, 2005.

[35-4]

Decoherence induced by a composite environment, Fernando C. Lombardo, Paula I. Villar, arXiv:quant-ph/0508121, 2005.

[35-5]

An Exactly Solvable Model of an Avalanche-Type Measuring Device: Macroscopic Distinctiveness and Wavefunction Collapse, R. Merlin, arXiv:quant-ph/0507250, 2005.

[35-6]

Algebras of Measurements: the logical structure of Quantum Mechanics, Daniel Lehmann, Kurt Engesser, Dov M. Gabbay, arXiv:quant-ph/0507231, 2005.

[35-7]

Quantum mechanical description of measurement and the basic properties of state transformation, Iman Marvian, arXiv:quant-ph/0507230, 2005.

[35-8]

Completely Quantized Collapse and Consequences, Philip Pearle, arXiv:quant-ph/0506177, 2005.

[35-9]

On the Energy Increase in Space-Collapse Models, Angelo Bassi, Emiliano Ippoliti, Bassano Vacchini, arXiv:quant-ph/0506083, 2005.

[35-10]

On the Everett programme and the Born rule, Patrick Van Esch, arXiv:quant-ph/0505059, 2005.

[35-11]

Decoherence at absolute zero, Supurna Sinha, arXiv:quant-ph/0505056, 2005.

[35-12]

On the mathematical Structure of Quantum Measurement Theory, Geoffrey Sewell, arXiv:math-ph/0505032, 2005.

[35-13]

Book Review: "Quantum Theory as an Emergent Phenomenon", by Stephen L. Adler, A. Bassi, arXiv:quant-ph/0504214, 2005.

[35-14]

Quantum measurement act as a "speech act", Jean Schneider, arXiv:quant-ph/0504199, 2005.

[35-15]

Decoherent histories and generalized measurements, Seth Lloyd, arXiv:quant-ph/0504155, 2005.

[35-16]

Wave function collapse implies divergence of average displacement, A. Marchewka, Z. Schuss, arXiv:quant-ph/0504105, 2005.

[35-17]

The Quantum Mechanics of Hyperion, Nathan Wiebe, L.E. Ballentine, arXiv:quant-ph/0503170, 2005.

[35-18]

Testing Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction via Cosmogenic Neutrinos, Christian, Joy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 160403, arXiv:quant-ph/0503001.

[35-19]

Problems of Quantum Measurement, Joseph F. Johnson, arXiv:quant-ph/0502124, 2005.

[35-20]

Quantum chaos algorithms and dissipative decoherence with quantum trajectories, Jae Weon Lee, Dima L. Shepelyansky, arXiv:quant-ph/0501120, 2005.

[35-21]

A model of quantum reduction with decoherence, Roland Omnes, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 065011, arXiv:quant-ph/0411201.

[35-22]

Probing Quantum Decoherence with High-Energy Neutrinos, Dan Hooper, Dean Morgan, Elizabeth Winstanley, Phys. Lett. B609 (2005) 206, arXiv:hep-ph/0410094.

[35-23]

An alternative to complementarity, G. Mardari, arXiv:quant-ph/0409197, 2004.

[35-24]

Reply to Comment on "Quantum Measurement and Decoherence", G.W.Ford, R.F.O'Connell, arXiv:quant-ph/0409178, 2004.

[35-25]

From Quantum To Classical Dynamics: A Landau Continuous Phase Transition With Spontaneous Superposition Breaking, Vladan Pankovic, Tristan Hubsch, Milan Predojevic, Miodrag Krmar, arXiv:quant-ph/0409010, 2004.

[35-26]

The quantum measurement process in an exactly solvable model, Armen E. Allahverdyan, Roger Balian, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen, arXiv:cond-mat/0408316, 2004.

[35-27]

Highly Nonclassical Quantum States and Environment Induced Decoherence, Peter Foldi, arXiv:quant-ph/0406232, 2004.

[35-28]

Towards Quantum Superpositions of a Mirror: Stochastic Collapse Analysis, A. Bassi, E. Ippoliti, Stephen L. Adler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 030401, arXiv:quant-ph/0406108.

[35-29]

A Relativistic Version of the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber Model, Roderich Tumulka, arXiv:quant-ph/0406094, 2004.

[35-30]

Quantum Brains: The OnuRules, Richard A Mould, arXiv:physics/0406016, 2004.

[35-31]

Quantum Brains: The NuRules, Richard A Mould, arXiv:physics/0406014, 2004.

[35-32]

Initial states and decoherence of histories, Artur Scherer, Andrei N. Soklakov, arXiv:quant-ph/0405080, 2004.

[35-33]

Toward reconstruction of relative state formulation of quantum theory, Yukinari Kurita, arXiv:quant-ph/0404032, 2004.

[35-34]

Fully polarized states and decoherence, Marco Frasca, arXiv:cond-mat/0403678, 2004.

[35-35]

Decoherence in the thermodynamic limit: A general result, Marco Frasca, Mod. Phys. Lett. B20 (2006) 1059-1066, arXiv:quant-ph/0403111.

[35-36]

Quantum Models of Mind: Are They Compatible with Environment Decoherence?, Jean Faber, Luiz Pinguelli Rosa, arXiv:quant-ph/0403051, 2004.

[35-37]

Active and Passive Quantum Erasers for Neutral Kaons, A. Bramon, G. Garbarino, B.C. Hiesmayr, Phys. Rev. A69 (2004) 062111, arXiv:quant-ph/0402212.

[35-38]

Loss of quantum coherence in a system coupled to a zero-temperature environment, A. Ratchov, F. Faure, F. W. J. Hekking, arXiv:quant-ph/0402176, 2004.

[35-39]

Quantum Superposition of a Mirror and Relative Decoherence (as Spontaneous Superposition Breaking), V. Pankovic, M. Predojevic, M. Krmar, arXiv:quant-ph/0312015, 2003.

[35-40]

Effect of an External Field on Decoherence, R. F. O'Connell, J. Zuo, arXiv:quant-ph/0311020, 2003.

[35-41]

Decoherence at zero temperature, G. W. Ford, R. F. O'Connell, arXiv:quant-ph/0311019, 2003.

[35-42]

Conceptual analysis of quantum history theory, G. Nistico', arXiv:quant-ph/0310135, 2003.

[35-43]

Quantum Theory and Time Asymmetry, H. D. Zeh, arXiv:quant-ph/0307013, 2003.

[35-44]

Toward a Quantum Theory of Observation, H. D. Zeh, arXiv:quant-ph/0306151, 2003. Corrected version of a paper published in 1973.

[35-45]

Decoherence, irreversibility and the selection by decoherence of quantum states with definite probabilities, R. Omnes, arXiv:quant-ph/0304100, 2003.

[35-46]

From quantum to quantum via decoherence, Ph. Blanchard, P. Lugiewicz, R. Olkiewicz, arXiv:math-ph/0302065, 2003.

[35-47]

Towards quantum superpositions of a mirror, Marshall, W., Simon, C., Penrose, Roger, Bouwmeester, D., Phys.Rev.Lett. 91 (2003) 130401.

[35-48]

Quantum Statistics and Entanglement Problems, L. E. H. Trainor, C. J. Lumsden, arXiv:quant-ph/0210181, 2002.

[35-49]

Bohmian Histories and Decoherent Histories, James B. Hartle, Phys. Rev. A69 (2004) 042111, arXiv:quant-ph/0209104.

[35-50]

Curie-Weiss model of the quantum measurement process, Armen E. Allahverdyan, Roger Balian, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen, Europhys. Lett. 61 (2003) 452-458, arXiv:cond-mat/0203460.

[35-51]

Why Decoherence has not Solved the Measurement Problem: A Response to P. W. Anderson, Adler, Stephen L., Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 34 (2003) 135, arXiv:quant-ph/0112095.

[35-52]

Environmental Influence on the Measurement Process in Stochastic Reduction Models, Stephen L. Adler, arXiv:quant-ph/0109029, 2001.

[35-53]

Quantum measurement as driven phase transition: An exactly solvable model, Armen E. Allahverdyan, Roger Balian, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen, arXiv:cond-mat/0102428, 2001.

[35-54]

A General Argument Against the Universal Validity of the Superposition Principle, Bassi, Angelo, Ghirardi, GianCarlo, Phys. Lett. A275 (2000) 373, arXiv:quant-ph/0009020.

[35-55]

About the Notion of Truth in the Decoherent Histories Approach: a reply to Griffiths, Bassi, Angelo, Ghirardi, GianCarlo, Phys. Lett. A265 (2000) 153, arXiv:quant-ph/9912065.

[35-56]

Decoherent Histories and Realism, Bassi, Angelo, Ghirardi, GianCarlo, J. Statist. Phys. 98 (2000) 457-494, arXiv:quant-ph/9912031.

[35-57]

Consistent histories, quantum truth functionals, and hidden variables, Griffiths, Robert B., Phys. Lett. A265 (2000) 12-19, arXiv:quant-ph/9909049.

[35-58]

More about Dynamical Reduction and the Enumeration Principle, Bassi, Angelo, Ghirardi, GianCarlo, arXiv:quant-ph/9907050, 1999.

[35-59]

The Quantum brain, Tegmark, Max, Phys.Rev. E61 (2000) 4194-4206, arXiv:quant-ph/9907009.

[35-60]

Classical interventions in quantum systems. I. The measuring process, Peres, Asher, arXiv:quant-ph/9906023, 1999.

[35-61]

Are Decoherent Histories logically consistent?, Bassi, Angelo, Ghirardi, GianCarlo, Phys. Lett. A257 (1999) 247, arXiv:gr-qc/9811050.

[35-62]

Why the quantum must yield to gravity, Christian, Joy, arXiv:gr-qc/9810078, 1998.

[35-63]

Do dynamical reduction models imply that arithmetic does not apply to ordinary macroscopic objects?, Ghirardi, GianCarlo, Bassi, Angelo, arXiv:quant-ph/9810041, 1998.

[35-64]

Quantum superpositions and definite perceptions: envisaging new feasible experimental tests, Ghirardi, GianCarlo, Phys. Lett. A262 (1999) 1-14, arXiv:quant-ph/9810028.

[35-65]

Quantum computation, entanglement and state reduction, Penrose, Roger, Phil.Trans.Roy.Soc.Lond. A356 (1998) 1927-1938.

[35-66]

Quantum Mechanics is Either Non-Linear Or Non-Introspective, Hubsch, Tristan, Mod. Phys. Lett. A13 (1998) 2503-2512, arXiv:quant-ph/9712047.

[35-67]

Quantum and classical descriptions of a measuring apparatus, Hay, Ori, Peres, Asher, Phys. Rev. A58 (1998) 116, arXiv:quant-ph/9712044.

[35-68]

Choice of Consistent Family, and Quantum Incompatibility, Griffiths, Robert B., Phys. Rev. A57 (1998) 1604, arXiv:quant-ph/9708028.

[35-69]

Against many worlds interpretations, Kent, Adrian, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5 (1990) 1745, arXiv:gr-qc/9703089.

[35-70]

Consistent Sets Yield Contrary Inferences in Quantum Theory, Kent, Adrian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 2874-2877, arXiv:gr-qc/9604012.

[35-71]

On gravity's role in quantum state reduction, Penrose, Roger, Gen.Rel.Grav. 28 (1996) 581-600.

[35-72]

Decoherence: Basic Concepts and Their Interpretation, H. D. Zeh, arXiv:quant-ph/9506020, 1995.

[35-73]

Spontaneous wave packet reduction, Ghirardi, GianCarlo, Annals N. Y. Acad. Sci. 755 (1995) 506-523.

[35-74]

Spontaneous localization of a system of identical particles, Ghirardi, G. C., Nicrosini, O., Rimini, A., Weber, T., Nuovo Cim. B102 (1988) 383.

[35-75]

On disentanglement of quantum wave functions: answer to a comment on "unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems", Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., Weber, T., Phys. Rev. D36 (1987) 3287.

[35-76]

Quantum mechanics with spontaneous localization and the quantum theory of measurement, Benatti, F., Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., Weber, T., Nuovo Cim. B100 (1987) 27.

[35-77]

A unified dynamics for micro and macro systems, Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., Weber, T., Phys. Rev. D34 (1986) 470.

[35-78]

The Emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment, Joos, E., Zeh, H. D., Z. Phys. B59 (1985) 223-243.

[35-79]

Can we undo quantum measurements?, Peres, Asher, Phys. Rev. D22 (1980) 879.

[36-1]

Realism in the Realized Popper's Experiment, Geoffrey Hunter, arXiv:quant-ph/0507009, 2005. MRST 2002.

[36-2]

A New Ontological View of the Quantum Measurement Problem, Xiaolei Zhang, arXiv:quant-ph/0506100, 2005. Albert Einstein Century conference, Paris, France, July 2005.

[36-3]

Statistical Mechanics of Amplifying Apparatus, Joseph Johnson, arXiv:quant-ph/0502044, 2005. VIII International Wigner Symposium, NY 2003.

[36-4]

Decoherence in Quantum Systems, R. F. O'Connell, arXiv:quant-ph/0501097, 2005. 2004 IEEE NTC Quantum Device Technology Workshop, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 4, 77, 2005.

[36-6]

Dynamics of a quantum measurement, Armen E. Allahverdyan, Roger Balian, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen, arXiv:quant-ph/0412045, 2004.

[36-6]

Dynamics of a quantum measurement, Armen E. Allahverdyan, Roger Balian, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen, arXiv:quant-ph/0412045, 2004.

[36-7]

Wigner Distribution Analysis of a Schrodinger Cat Superposition of Displaced Equilibrium Coherent States, G.W. Ford, R.F. O'Connell, arXiv:quant-ph/0409188, 2004. Wigner Centennial Conference.

[36-8]

The quantum measurement process: an exactly solvable model, A.E. Allahverdyan, R. Balian, Th.M. Nieuwenhuizen, arXiv:cond-mat/0309188, 2003. Anomalies and Strange Behavior in Physics: Challenging the conventional, Napels, April, 2003.

[36-9]

Feynman's decoherence, Kim, Y. S., Noz, Marilyn E., arXiv:quant-ph/0206146, 2002. 9th Int'l Conference on Quantum Optics (Raubichi, Belarus, May 2002).

[37-1]

Experimentally friendly geometrical criteria for entanglement, P. Badziag, C. Brukner, W. Laskowski, T. Paterek, M. Zukowski, arXiv:0711.4282, 2007.

[37-2]

Are quantum correlations local elements of reality? A Bell inequality to test this, Michael Seevinck, arXiv:quant-ph/0508175, 2005.

[37-3]

Loophole-free Bell's experiment based on two-photon all-versus-nothing violation of local realism, Adan Cabello, arXiv:quant-ph/0507260, 2005.

[37-4]

Popper's Experiment and Superluminal Communication, Edward Gerjuoy, Andrew M. Sessler, arXiv:quant-ph/0507121, 2005.

[37-5]

Lorentz-covariant reduced spin density matrix and EPR-Bohm correlations, P. Caban, J. Rembielinski, arXiv:quant-ph/0507056, 2005.

[37-6]

A General Relativistic Generalization of Bell Inequality, Vladan Pankovic, arXiv:quant-ph/0506129, 2005.

[37-7]

An Entangled Web of Crime: Bell's Theorem as a Short Story, Kurt Jacobs, Howard Wiseman, arXiv:quant-ph/0504192, 2005.

[37-8]

Common Cause and Contextual Realization of Bell Correlation, A. Shafiee, R. Maleeh, M. Golshani, arXiv:quant-ph/0504121, 2005.

[37-9]

Lifting Bell inequalities, Stefano Pironio, arXiv:quant-ph/0503179, 2005.

[37-10]

Bell's Theorem: A Critique, Michael Clover, arXiv:quant-ph/0502016, 2005.

[37-11]

Popper's test of Quantum Mechanics, A. Bramon, R. Escribano, arXiv:quant-ph/0501134, 2005.

[37-12]

Overcoming the EPR paradox, Ghenadie N. Mardari, arXiv:quant-ph/0412160, 2004.

[37-13]

Bell's inequality tests: from photons to B-mesons, A. Bramon, R. Escribano, G. Garbarino, J. Mod. Opt. 52 (2005) 1681, arXiv:quant-ph/0410122.

[37-14]

Bell's theorem: Critique of proofs with and without inequalities, Karl Hess, Walter Philipp, arXiv:quant-ph/0410015, 2004.

[37-15]

Basis States for Relativistic, Dynamically-Entangled Particles, N.L. Harshman, arXiv:quant-ph/0409204, 2004.

[37-16]

How larger quantum correlations are than classical ones, Adan Cabello, arXiv:quant-ph/0409192, 2004.

[37-17]

Bell's theorem without inequalities and without unspeakable information, Adan Cabello, arXiv:quant-ph/0409190, 2004.

[37-18]

Reply to Marinatto"s comment on "Bell"s theorem without inequalities and without alignments", Adan Cabello, arXiv:quant-ph/0409189, 2004.

[37-19]

Counterfactual errors and state reduction in relativistic quantum physics, Jon Eakins, George Jaroszkiewicz, arXiv:quant-ph/0406097, 2004.

[37-20]

Complete Correlation, Detection loophole and Bell's Theorem, Afshin Shafiee, Mehdi Golshani, arXiv:quant-ph/0406042, 2004.

[37-21]

George Boole and the Bell inequalities, Elemer E Rosinger, arXiv:quant-ph/0406004, 2004.

[37-22]

Understanding Popper's Experiment, Tabish Qureshi, arXiv:quant-ph/0405057, 2004.

[37-23]

A remark about the Mermin-Squires Music Hall's inteludium, Gavriel Segre, arXiv:quant-ph/0403087, 2004.

[37-24]

Bell's inequality for conditional probabilities as a test for quantum-like behaviour of mind, Andrei Khrennikov, arXiv:quant-ph/0402169, 2004.

[37-25]

Quantum Entanglement in Time, Caslav Brukner, Samuel Taylor, Sancho Cheung, Vlatko Vedral, arXiv:quant-ph/0402127, 2004.

[37-26]

The structure of Bell inequalities, Guenter Schachner, arXiv:quant-ph/0312117, 2003.

[37-27]

On separability of quantum states and the violation of Bell-type inequalities, E. R. Loubenets, arXiv:quant-ph/0310116, 2003.

[37-28]

The Meaning of Bell's Theorem, A. Rizzi, arXiv:quant-ph/0310098, 2003.

[37-29]

Rotationally invariant proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities, A. Cabello, arXiv:quant-ph/0306073, 2003.

[37-30]

Symmetries of the Bell correlation inequalities, C. Sliwa, arXiv:quant-ph/0305190, 2003.

[37-31]

On the reality of EPR paradox, Janis Ruza, arXiv:quant-ph/0304014, 2003.

[37-32]

Nonlocal hidden-variable theories and quantum mechanics: An incompatibility theorem, A.J. Leggett, Found. Phys. 33 (2003) 1469-1493.

[37-33]

EPR experiments without "collapse of the wave function", Kayser, B., Stodolsky, L., Phys. Lett. B359 (1995) 343-350.

[37-34]

Experiments of the EPR type involving CP violation do not allow faster than light communication between distant observers, Ghirardi, G. C., Grassi, R., Rimini, A., Weber, T., Europhys. Lett. 6 (1988) 95.

[38-1]

Identical particles and entanglement, GianCarlo Ghirardi, Luca Marinatto, arXiv:quant-ph/0509195, 2005. International Conference on Quantum Optics 2004, Minsk, Belarus.

[38-2]

Quantum information and general relativity, Asher Peres, Fortsch. Phys. 52 (2004) 1052, arXiv:quant-ph/0405127. "Quantum Optics for Quantum Information Processing", Rome, 7-8 May 2004.

[39-1]

Hidden Variables, Non Contextuality and Einstein-Locality in Quantum Mechanics, Virendra Singh, arXiv:quant-ph/0507182, 2005.

[39-2]

The de Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave interpretation of quantum theory, W. Struyve, arXiv:quant-ph/0506243, 2005.

[39-3]

The shadow of light: further experimental evidences, F. Cardone et al., arXiv:physics/0504166, 2005.

[39-4]

On a Density-of-States Approach to Bohmian Mechanics, Guy Potvin, arXiv:quant-ph/0504110, 2005.

[39-5]

On the Consequences of Retaining the General Validity of Locality in Physical Theory, W. De Baere, arXiv:quant-ph/0504030, 2005.

[39-6]

Bohmian trajectories and the ether: Where does the analogy fail?, Louis Marchildon, arXiv:quant-ph/0502049, 2005.

[39-7]

Quantum theory of microworld and the reality, Milos V. Lokajacek, arXiv:quant-ph/0501111, 2005.

[39-8]

Many-fingered time in quantum field theory, measurement, and the Bohmian interpretation, H. Nikolic, Phys. Lett. A348 (2006) 166, arXiv:hep-th/0501046.

[39-9]

Pre- and Post-selection paradoxes and contextuality in quantum mechanics, M. S. Leifer, R. W. Spekkens, arXiv:quant-ph/0412178, 2004.

[39-10]

Why isn't every physicist a Bohmian?, Oliver Passon, arXiv:quant-ph/0412119, 2004.

[39-11]

Quantum physics with a hidden variable, Antonio Cassa, arXiv:quant-ph/0412074, 2004.

[39-12]

Time and Ensemble Averages in Bohmian Mechanics, Yakir Aharonov, Noam Erez, Marlan O. Scully, arXiv:quant-ph/0412068, 2004.

[39-13]

A Bohmian approach to quantum fractals, A. S. Sanz, arXiv:quant-ph/0412050, 2004.

[39-14]

Hidden Variables and Nonlocality in Quantum Mechanics, Douglas L. Hemmick, arXiv:quant-ph/0412011, 2004.

[39-15]

Proposal of Michelson-Morley experiment via single photon interferometer: Interpretation of Michelson-Morley experimental results using de Broglie-Bohm picture, Masanori Sato, arXiv:physics/0411217, 2004.

[39-16]

Covariant canonical quantization of fields and Bohmian mechanics, H. Nikolic, Eur. Phys. J. C42 (2005) 365, arXiv:hep-th/0407228.

[39-17]

A relativistically covariant version of Bohm's quantum field theory for the scalar field, George Horton, C Dewdney, J. Phys. A37 (2004) 11935, arXiv:quant-ph/0407089.

[39-18]

Relativistic quantum mechanics and the Bohmian interpretation, H. Nikolic, Found. Phys. Lett. 18 (2005) 549, arXiv:quant-ph/0406173.

[39-19]

The time evolution of the Bohmian Pilot Wave, Miroslaw Kozlowski, Janina Marciak-Kozlowska, arXiv:quant-ph/0406121, 2004.

[39-20]

Bohmian dwell times without trajectories, Sabine Kreidl, arXiv:quant-ph/0406045, 2004.

[39-21]

Are All Particles Identical?, Sheldon Goldstein, James Taylor, Roderich Tumulka, Nino Zanghi, J. Phys. A38 (2005) 1567, arXiv:quant-ph/0405039.

[39-22]

Are All Particles Real?, Sheldon Goldstein, James Taylor, Roderich Tumulka, Nino Zanghi, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 36 (2005) 103, arXiv:quant-ph/0404134.

[39-23]

Understanding Quantum Theory in Terms of Geometry, Fatimah Shojai, Ali Shojai, arXiv:gr-qc/0404102, 2004.

[39-24]

The Statistical Interpretation of Entangled States, B. C. Sanctuary, arXiv:quant-ph/0404011, 2004.

[39-25]

Dynamical Origin of Quantum Probabilities, Antony Valentini, Hans Westman, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A461 (2005) 253-272, arXiv:quant-ph/0403034.

[39-26]

All quantum observables in a hidden-variables model must commute simultaneously, James D. Malley, arXiv:quant-ph/0402126, 2004.

[39-27]

EPR-Bohm experiment and interference of probabilities, Andrei Khrennikov, arXiv:quant-ph/0402068, 2004.

[39-28]

The density matrix in the de Broglie-Bohm approach, O. J. E. Maroney, arXiv:quant-ph/0311149, 2003.

[39-29]

On the Role of Density Matrices in Bohmian Mechanics, Detlef Duerr, Sheldon Goldstein, Roderich Tumulka, Nino Zanghi, arXiv:quant-ph/0311127, 2003.

[39-30]

How can one find nonlocality in Bohmian mechanics?, A. Khrennikov, arXiv:quant-ph/0311108, 2003.

[39-31]

Entanglement and Time, A. Suarez, arXiv:quant-ph/0311004, 2003.

[39-32]

Grandma's local realistic theory for the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger experiment, B. L. Lan, arXiv:quant-ph/0310119, 2003.

[39-33]

A Bohmian view on quantum decoherence, A. S. Sanz, F. Borondo, arXiv:quant-ph/0310096, 2003.

[39-34]

Grandma's local realistic theory for the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment, B. L. Lan, arXiv:quant-ph/0309219, 2003.

[39-35]

Reappraisal of the causal interpretation of quantum mechanics and of the quantum potential concept, R. H. Parmenter, A. L. DiRienzo, arXiv:quant-ph/0305183, 2003.

[39-36]

On compatibility of Bohmian mechanics with standard quantum mechanics, H. Nikolic, arXiv:quant-ph/0305131, 2003.

[39-37]

About entanglement properties of kaons and tests of hidden variables models, Genovese, M., Phys. Rev. A69 (2004) 022103, arXiv:quant-ph/0305087.

[39-38]

Exclusion of Time in Mermin's Proof of Bell-Type Inequalities, K. Hess, W. Philipp, arXiv:quant-ph/0305037, 2003.

[39-39]

Reply to: Comment on "Bohmian prediction about a two double-slit experiment and its disagreement with SQM", O. Akhavan, M. Golshani, arXiv:quant-ph/0305020, 2003.

[39-40]

A de Broglie-Bohm Like Model for Dirac Equation, O. Chavoya-Aceves, arXiv:quant-ph/0304195, 2003.

[39-41]

The Innsbruck EPR Experiment: A Time-Retarded Local Description of Space-like Separated Correlations, M. Clover, arXiv:quant-ph/0304115, 2003.

[39-42]

A Bohmian Interpretation for Noncommutative Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Mechanics, G. D. Barbosa, arXiv:hep-th/0304105, 2003.

[39-43]

A geometric proof of the Kochen-Specker no-go theorem, R. D. Gill, M. S. Keane, arXiv:quant-ph/0304013, 2003.

[39-44]

Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory, D. Duerr, S. Goldstein, R. Tumulka, N. Zanghi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 090402, arXiv:quant-ph/0303156.

[39-45]

Local Hidden Variable Theories for Quantum States, B. M. Terhal, A. C. Doherty, D. Schwab, arXiv:quant-ph/0210053, 2002.

[39-46]

Violation of Bell inequalities for beables, P. Morgan, arXiv:quant-ph/0009087, 2000.

[39-47]

Bohmian Mechanics Revisited, Deotto, E., Ghirardi, G. C., Found. Phys. 28 (1998) 1-30, arXiv:quant-ph/9704021.

[39-48]

A Suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables. 1, Bohm, D., Phys. Rev. 85 (1952) 166-179.

[40-1]

Nonlocality without inequalities, GianCarlo Ghirardi, Luca Marinatto, arXiv:quant-ph/0509194, 2005. ICSSUR'05, Besancon, France, 2-6 May 2005.

[40-2]

Logical Pre- and Post-Selection paradoxes, measurement-disturbance and contextuality, M. S. Leifer, R. W. Spekkens, arXiv:quant-ph/0412179, 2004. Quantum Structures 2004.

[41-1]

Sufficient conditions for the anti-Zeno effect, Pavel Exner, arXiv:quant-ph/0502125, 2005.

[41-2]

General expression for the quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno effects, J. Ruseckas, B. Kaulakys, arXiv:quant-ph/0403123, 2004.

[41-3]

Zeno dynamics and constraints, Facchi, P., Marmo, G., Pascazio, S., Scardicchio, A., Sudarshan, G., J. Optics B6 (2004) S492-S501.

[41-4]

Mathematics of the Quantum Zeno Effect, A.U. Schmidt, arXiv:math-ph/0307044, 2003.

[41-5]

Simple computer model for the quantum Zeno effect, Wallace, David, Phys. Rev. A 63 (2001) 022109, American Physical Society.

[41-6]

Quantum Zeno dynamics, Facchi, P., Gorini, V., Marmo, G., Pascazio, S., Sudarshan, G., Phys. Lett. A275 (2000) 12.

[41-7]

Temporal behavior and quantum Zeno time of an excited state of the hydrogen atom, Facchi, P., Pascazio, S., Phys. Lett. A241 (1998) 139-144, arXiv:quant-ph/9905017.

[41-8]

Quantum Zeno and quantum anti-Zeno effects, Gontis, V., Kaulakys, B., Lith. Phys. J. 38 (1998) 118-121, arXiv:quant-ph/9806015.

[41-9]

Relevance for local realism, macroscopic realism, and non-invasive measurability at the macroscopic level, D. Home, M. A. B. Whitaker, Phys. Lett. A 239 (1998) 6-12.

[41-10]

A Conceptual Analysis of Quantum Zeno, D. Home, M. A. B. Whitaker, Ann. Phys. 258 (1997) 237-285.

[41-11]

Early time properties of quantum evolution, Urbanowski, K., Phys. Rev. A 50 (1994) 2847, American Physical Society.

[41-12]

Strange properties of short time evolution of the projection of state vector, Urbanowski, K., Found. Phys. Lett. 7 (1994) 285.

[41-13]

Possible consequences of the Zeno effect on nuclear double beta decay and a bound on , Levitan, Jacob, Horwitz, L. P., Europhys. Lett. 9 (1989) 761.

[41-14]

The time scale for quantum Zeno paradox and proton decay, Chiu, C. B., Misra, B., Sudarshan, E. C. G., Phys. Lett. B117 (1982) 34.

[41-15]

Zeno paradox in quantum theory, Peres, Asher, Am. J. Phys. 48 (1980) 931-932.

[41-16]

Small time behavior of quantum nondecay probability and Zeno's paradox in quantum mechanics, Ghirardi, G. C., Omero, C., Rimini, A., Weber, T., Nuovo Cim. A52 (1979) 421-442.

[41-17]

The Zeno's Paradox in Quantum Theory, Misra, B., Sudarshan, E. C. G., J. Math. Phys. 18 (1977) 756.

[41-18]

Time Evolution of Unstable Quantum States and a Resolution of Zeno's Paradox, Chiu, C. B., Sudarshan, E. C. G., Misra, B., Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 520-529.

[42-1]

Physical limits on information processing, Stephen D.H. Hsu, Phys. Lett. B641 (2006) 99-100, arXiv:hep-th/0607082.

[42-2]

A Study on the basics of Quantum Computing, Prashant, arXiv:quant-ph/0511061, 2005.

[42-3]

Jarlskog's Parametrization of Unitary Matrices and Qudit Theory, Kazuyuki Fujii, Kunio Funahashi, Takayuki Kobayashi, arXiv:quant-ph/0508006, 2005.

[42-4]

Fundamental gravitational limitations to quantum computing, Rodolfo Gambini, Rafael A. Porto, Jorge Pullin, arXiv:quant-ph/0507262, 2005.

[42-5]

Towards Large-Scale Quantum Computation, Austin G. Fowler, arXiv:quant-ph/0506126, 2005.

[42-6]

And what if Bohm was right? The fundamental problem of quantum cryptography and a way to circumvent it, Marek Czachor, Marcin Pawlowski, arXiv:quant-ph/0412212, 2004.

[42-7]

How to build a 300 bit, 1 Gop quantum computer, Andrew M. Steane, arXiv:quant-ph/0412165, 2004.

[42-8]

Limits on Efficient Computation in the Physical World, Scott Aaronson, arXiv:quant-ph/0412143, 2004.

[42-9]

Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Christopher Gordon Timpson, arXiv:quant-ph/0412063, 2004.

[42-10]

Complementarity and Entanglement in Quantum Information Theory, Tracey E. Tessier, arXiv:quant-ph/0412060, 2004.

[42-11]

The Fraunhofer Quantum Computing Portal - www.qc.fraunhofer.de - A web-based Simulator of Quantum Computing Processes, Helge Rose' et al., arXiv:quant-ph/0406089, 2004.

[42-12]

Universal Limits on Computation, Lawrence M. Krauss, Glenn D. Starkman, arXiv:astro-ph/0404510, 2004.

[42-13]

Finiteness of the universe and computation beyond Turing computability, Tien D. Kieu, arXiv:quant-ph/0403045, 2004.

[42-14]

Measurement-Based Quantum Turing Machines and Questions of Universalities, Simon Perdrix, Philippe Jorrand, arXiv:quant-ph/0402156, 2004.

[42-15]

Towards Linear Optical Quantum Computers, Jonathan P. Dowling, James D. Franson, Hwang Lee, Gerald J. Milburn, arXiv:quant-ph/0402090, 2004.

[42-16]

Multilinear Formulas and Skepticism of Quantum Computing, S. Aaronson, arXiv:quant-ph/0311039, 2003.

[42-17]

From Fermat's last theorem to the quantum computer, A.r Yu. Vlasov, arXiv:quant-ph/0307019, 2003.

[42-18]

Quaternionic Computing, J. M. Fernandez, W. A. Schneeberger, arXiv:quant-ph/0307017, 2003.

[42-19]

Remarks on the nature of quantum computation, R. Alicki, arXiv:quant-ph/0306103, 2003.

[42-20]

Vulnerabilities in Quantum Key Distribution Protocols, D. R. Kuhn, arXiv:quant-ph/0305076, 2003.

[42-21]

The Signals and Systems Approach to Quantum Computation, H. Gopalkrishna Gadiyar, K. M. Sangeeta Maini, R. Padma, H.S. Sharatchandra, arXiv:quant-ph/0305073, 2003.

[42-22]

The Semi-Quantum Computer, R. O. Vianna, W. R. M. Rabelo, C. H. Monken, arXiv:quant-ph/0304085, 2003.

[42-23]

Quantum vs classical computation: a proposal opening a new perspective, A. Bassi, G. C. Ghirardi, arXiv:quant-ph/0304074, 2003.

[42-24]

Quantum Simulations of Physics Problems, R. Somma, G. Ortiz, E. Knill, J. Gubernatis, arXiv:quant-ph/0304063, 2003.

[42-25]

Three Paradoxes of Quantum Information, Subhash Kak, arXiv:quant-ph/0304060, 2003.

[42-26]

Quantum Seals, H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, arXiv:quant-ph/0303173, 2003.

[42-27]

Bell's theorem without inequalities and without alignments, Adan Cabello, arXiv:quant-ph/0303076, 2003.

[42-28]

Direction Cryptography in Quantum Communications, Walter Simmons, Sandip Pakvasa, arXiv:quant-ph/0302186, 2003.

[42-29]

Violation of Bell's inequality: criterion for quantum communication complexity advantage, Caslav Brukner, Marek Zukowski, Jian-Wei Pan, Anton Zeilinger, arXiv:quant-ph/0210114, 2002.

[42-30]

Quantum NP - A Survey, Dorit Aharonov, Tomer Naveh, arXiv:quant-ph/0210077, 2002.

[42-31]

Operation Time of Quantum Gates, Lev B. Levitin, Tommaso Toffoli, Zachary Walton, arXiv:quant-ph/0210076, 2002.

[42-32]

A Quantum Random Walk Search Algorithm, Neil Shenvi, Julia Kempe, K. Birgitta Whaley, arXiv:quant-ph/0210064, 2002.

[42-33]

Uncloneable Encryption, Daniel Gottesman, arXiv:quant-ph/0210062, 2002.

[42-34]

Quantum cloning with continuous variables, Nicolas J. Cerf, arXiv:quant-ph/0210061, 2002.

[42-35]

A single quantum cannot be teleported, Daniele Tommasini, arXiv:quant-ph/0210060, 2002.

[42-36]

Founding Mistrustful Quantum Cryptography on Coin Tossing?, Adrian Kent, arXiv:quant-ph/0111097, 2001.

[42-37]

A quantum computer only needs one universe, A. M. Steane, arXiv:quant-ph/0003084, 2000.

[43-1]

Quantum Computing, Metrology, and Imaging, Hwang Lee, Pavel Lougovski, Jonathan P. Dowling, arXiv:quant-ph/0506150, 2005. SPIE: Fluctuations and Noise in Photonics and Quantum Optics III (2005).

[43-2]

The Future of Computation, Apoorva Patel, arXiv:quant-ph/0503068, 2005. Workshop on Quantum Information, Computation and Communication (QICC-2005), IIT Kharagpur, India, February 2005.

[43-3]

Does Quantum Mechanics allow for Infinite Parallelism?, Martin Ziegler, arXiv:quant-ph/0410141, 2004. Quantum Structure 2004 (Denver).

[43-4]

Physical-resource demands for scalable quantum computation, Carlton M. Caves, Ivan H. Deutsch, Robin Blume-Kohout, arXiv:quant-ph/0304083, 2003. SPIE Conference on Fluctuations and Noise in Photonics and Quantum Optics, Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 1-4, 2003.

[44-1]

A General Setting for Geometric Phase of Mixed States in Arbitrary Evolution, A. T. Rezakhani, P. Zanardi, arXiv:quant-ph/0507280, 2005.

[45-1]

On coherence lengths of wave packets II: High energy neutrino, K. Ishikawa, Y. Tobita, arXiv:0911.0575, 2009.

[45-2]

On coherence lengths of wave packets, Kenzo Ishikawa, Yutaka Tobita, arXiv:0906.3938, 2009.

[45-3]

What Time an Incident Wave Packet is Reflected?, Khaled Saaidi, arXiv:quant-ph/0504128, 2005.

[45-4]

Simple examples of position-momentum correlated Gaussian free-particle wavepackets in one-dimension with the general form of the time-dependent spread in position, R. W. Robinett, M. A. Doncheski, L. C. Bassett, arXiv:quant-ph/0502097, 2005.

[45-5]

Non-classical properties of quantum wave packets propagating in a Kerr-like medium, C. Sudheesh, S. Lakshmibala, V. Balakrishnan, arXiv:quant-ph/0502046, 2005.

[45-6]

Spontaneous emission of a photon: wave packet structures and atom-photon entanglement, M.V. Fedorov et al., arXiv:quant-ph/0412107, 2004.

[45-7]

Initial wave packets and the various power-law decreases of scattered wave packets at long times, Manabu Miyamoto, arXiv:quant-ph/0404057, 2004.

[45-8]

Enhanced group velocity in metamaterials, T.G. Mackay, A. Lakhtakia, arXiv:physics/0402037, 2004.

[45-9]

Classical aspects of ultracold atom wavepacket motion through microstructured waveguide bends, M. W. J. Bromley, B. D. Esry, arXiv:physics/0402032, 2004.

[45-10]

Signatures of wave packet revival phenomena in the expectation values of observables, C. Sudheesh, S. Lakshmibala, V. Balakrishnan, arXiv:quant-ph/0401181, 2004.

[45-11]

Applications of the wave packet method to resonant transmission and reflection gratings, Andrei G. Borisov, Sergei V. Shabanov, arXiv:physics/0312103, 2003.

[45-12]

Answer to Comsa's Comment, H. Kaiser, S. A. Werner, E. A. George, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1106.

[45-13]

Comment on "Direct Measurement of the Longitudinal Coherence Length of a Thermal Neutron Beam", G. Comsa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1105.

[45-14]

Longitudinal Coherence in neutron Interferometry, A. G. Klein, G. I. Opat, W. A. Hamilton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 563.

[45-15]

Direct Measurement of the Longitudinal Coherence Length of a Thermal Neutron Beam, H. Kaiser, S. A. Werner, E. A. George, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 560.

[45-16]

V.F. Weisskopf, Z. Physik 75 (1932) 287.

[45-17]

V.F. Weisskopf, Z. Physik 77 (1932) 398.

[46-1]

Heisenberg"s Introduction of the `Collapse of the Wavepacket" into Quantum Mechanics, R. Y. Chiao, P. G. Kwiat, arXiv:quant-ph/0201036, 2002. Heisenberg Centennial Symposium, Bamberg, Germany, Sept. 2001.

[47-1]

Exact Quantum Loop Results in the Theory of General Relativity, B.F.L. Ward, arXiv:hep-ph/0607198, 2006.

[47-2]

A lower limit to the scale of an effective theory of gravitation, Caldwell, Robert R., Grin, Daniel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 031301, arXiv:astro-ph/0606133.

[47-3]

General Relativistic Effects of Gravity in Quantum Mechanics - A Case of Ultra-Relativistic, Spin 1/2 Particles -, Kohkichi Konno, Masumi Kasai, Prog. Theor. Phys. 100 (1998) 1145, arXiv:gr-qc/0603035.

[47-4]

Quantum Nature of the Big Bang, Abhay Ashtekar, Tomasz Pawlowski, Parampreet Singh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 141301, arXiv:gr-qc/0602086.

[47-5]

Observational Consequences of Quantum Cosmology, Qing-Guo Huang, Nucl. Phys. B777 (2007) 253-261, arXiv:hep-th/0510219.

[47-6]

Beyond partial differential equations: A course on linear and quasi-linear abstract hyperbolic evolution equations, Horst R. Beyer, arXiv:gr-qc/0510097, 2005.

[47-7]

Tommy Gold revisited: Why does not the universe rotate?, Chapline, George, Mazur, Pawel O., Aip Conf. Proc. 822 (2006) 160, arXiv:astro-ph/0509230.

[47-8]

A Proposed Test of the Local Causality of Spacetime, Adrian Kent, arXiv:gr-qc/0507045, 2005.

[47-9]

A freely falling frame at the interface of gravitational and quantum realms, Ahluwalia-Khalilova, D. V., Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 1433-1450, arXiv:hep-th/0503141.

[47-10]

The Computational Universe: Quantum gravity from quantum computation, Seth Lloyd, arXiv:quant-ph/0501135, 2005.

[47-11]

How does the entropy/information bound work ?, Jacob D. Bekenstein, Found. Phys. 35 (2005) 1805, arXiv:quant-ph/0404042.

[47-12]

Fundamental physics in space: A quantum-gravity perspective, Amelino-Camelia, Giovanni, Gen. Rel. Grav. 36 (2004) 539-560, arXiv:astro-ph/0309174.

[47-13]

Spacetime at the Planck Scale: The Quantum Computer View, Paola Zizzi, arXiv:gr-qc/0304032, 2003.

[47-14]

Cosmological Perturbations from a New-Physics Hypersurface, V. Bozza, M. Giovannini, G. Veneziano, JCAP 0305 (2003) 001, arXiv:hep-th/0302184.

[47-15]

Experimental Challenges for Quantum Gravity, Robert C. Myers, Maxim Pospelov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 211601, arXiv:hep-ph/0301124.

[47-16]

An exactly soluble sector of quantum gravity, Christian, Joy, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 4844-4877, arXiv:gr-qc/9701013.

[47-17]

Gravitation, the Quantum, and Cosmological Constant, Pawel O. Mazur, Acta Phys. Polon. 27 (1996) 1849, arXiv:hep-th/9603014.

[48-1]

Lorentz violation as a quantum-gravity signature, Lehnert, Ralf, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20 (2005) 1303, arXiv:astro-ph/0508625. Coral Gables Conference on Launching of Belle Epoque in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology (CG 2003), Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, 17-21 Dec 2003.

[48-2]

Dark Energy Stars, G. Chapline, eConf C041213 (2005) 0205, arXiv:astro-ph/0503200. Texas Conference on Relativistic Astrophysics, Stanford, CA, December, 2004.

[48-3]

Emergent relativity, Laughlin, R. B., Int. J. Mod. Phys. A18 (2003) 831-854, arXiv:gr-qc/0302028.

[48-4]

Quantum-gravity phenomenology: Status and prospects, Amelino-Camelia, Giovanni, Mod. Phys. Lett. A17 (2002) 899-922, arXiv:gr-qc/0204051. 1st IUCAA Workshop on Interface of Gravitational and Quantum Realms, Pune, India, 17-21 Dec 2001.

[48-5]

Superfluid analogies of cosmological phenomena, Volovik, G. E., Phys. Rep. 351 (2001) 195-348, arXiv:gr-qc/0005091.

[49-1]

Is classical reality completely deterministic?, Boris Kosyakov, Found. Phys. 38 (2008) 76-88, arXiv:hep-th/0702185.

[49-2]

Classical mechanics without determinism, H. Nikolic, Found. Phys. Lett. 19 (2006) 553-566, arXiv:quant-ph/0505143.

[49-3]

Quantum mechanics as "space-time statistical mechanics"?, Anders Mansson, arXiv:quant-ph/0501133, 2005.

[49-4]

Classical Physics revisited: Derivation and explanation of the quantum mechanical superposition principle and Born's rule, Gerhard Groessing, arXiv:quant-ph/0410236, 2004.

[49-5]

The Emergence of Classical Dynamics in a Quantum World, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Salman Habib, Kurt Jacobs, arXiv:quant-ph/0407096, 2004.

[49-6]

Classical Physics and Quantum Loops, Barry R. Holstein, John F. Donoghue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 201602, arXiv:hep-th/0405239.

[49-7]

On the notion of phase in mechanics, Maurice de Gosson, arXiv:quant-ph/0404072, 2004.

[49-8]

Does the wavefunction of the universe exist?, Thomas Kruger, arXiv:quant-ph/0404044, 2004.

[49-9]

A Classical Explanation of the Bohm-Aharonov Effect, O. Chavoya-Aceves, arXiv:physics/0404031, 2004.

[49-10]

Zitterbewegung and semiclassical observables for the Dirac equation, Jens Bolte, Rainer Glaser, arXiv:quant-ph/0402154, 2004.

[49-11]

Is Fresnel Optics Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space?, O. Crasser, H. Mack, W. P. Schleich, arXiv:quant-ph/0402115, 2004.

[49-12]

Phase Space Correspondence between Classical Optics and Quantum Mechanics, Daniela Dragoman, arXiv:quant-ph/0402100, 2004.

[49-13]

Inconsistency of quantum-classical dynamics, and what it implies, Daniel R. Terno, Found. Phys. 36 (2006) 102, arXiv:quant-ph/0402092.

[49-14]

Classical elementary particles, spin, zitterbewegung and all that, Martin Rivas, arXiv:physics/0312107, 2003.

[49-15]

On the connection between classical and quantum descriptions, I. D. Mandzhavidze, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 45 (1987) 442, arXiv:hep-ph/0311196.

[49-16]

From Classical Hamiltonian Flow to Quantum Theory: Derivation of the Schroedinger Equation, G. Groessing, arXiv:quant-ph/0311109, 2003.

[49-17]

Comparing classical and quantum probability distributions for an asymmetric infinite well, M. A. Doncheski, R. W. Robinett, arXiv:quant-ph/0307014, 2003.

[49-18]

Ensembles and experiments in classical and quantum physics, A. Neumaier, arXiv:quant-ph/0303047, 2003.

[50-1]

"t Hooft"s quantum determinism - path integral viewpoint, Massimo Blasone, Petr Jizba, Hagen Kleinert, arXiv:quant-ph/0504047, 2005. Second International Workshop DICE2004, From Decoherence and Emergent Classicality to Emergent Quantum Mechanics Piombino (Tuscany), September 1-4, 2004.

[50-2]

Classical Extensions, Classical Representations and Bayesian Updating in Quantum Mechanics, Guido Bacciagaluppi, arXiv:quant-ph/0403055, 2004. "Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations - 2", Vaexjoe, Sweden, June 2003.

[51-1]

Algorithmic approach to quantum physics, Yuri Ozhigov, arXiv:quant-ph/0412196, 2004.

[51-2]

On the Origin of Conceptual Difficulties of Quantum Mechanics, Volodymyr Krasnoholovets, arXiv:physics/0412122, 2004.

[51-3]

A New Approach to Quantising Space-Time: II. Quantising on a Category of Sets, C.J. Isham, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7 (2004) 807, arXiv:gr-qc/0304077.

[51-4]

Remarks on Mohrhoff's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Louis Marchildon, arXiv:quant-ph/0303170, 2003.

[51-5]

Embedding QM into an objective framework, Claudio Garola, arXiv:quant-ph/0303017, 2003.

[51-7]

How to Complete the Quantum-Mechanical Description?, Timur F. Kamalov, arXiv:quant-ph/0212139, 2002.

[51-7]

How to Complete the Quantum-Mechanical Description?, Timur F. Kamalov, arXiv:quant-ph/0212139, 2002.

[51-8]

Extending Heisenberg's measurement-disturbance relation to the twin-slit case, H.M. Wiseman, arXiv:quant-ph/0210065, 2002.

[51-9]

Can Quantum Mechanics be Cleared from Conceptual Difficulties?, Volodymyr Krasnoholovets, arXiv:quant-ph/0210050, 2002. 13 pages; report written for Wigner Centennial Conference (Pecs, Hungary, July, 2002).

[51-10]

The Heisenberg uncertainty relation: Limitation and reformulation, Masanao Ozawa, arXiv:quant-ph/0210044, 2002.

[51-11]

Extension of Quantum Mechanics to Individual Systems, Ax, James, Kochen, Simon, arXiv:quant-ph/9905077, 1999.

[53-1]

Quantum interference of particles and resonances, Ya. Azimov, J. Phys. G37 (2010) 023001, arXiv:0904.1376.

[53-2]

Quantum Entanglement of Neutrino Pairs, Junli Li, Cong-Feng Qiao, arXiv:0708.0291, 2007.

[53-3]

Astrophysical and Cosmological Tests of Quantum Theory, Antony Valentini, J. Phys. A40 (2007) 3285-3303, arXiv:hep-th/0610032.

[53-4]

Interference in Time: A Comment, Lawrence P. Horwitz, arXiv:quant-ph/0507044, 2005.

[55-1]

Hidden evidence of non-exponential nuclear decay, N. G. Kelkar, M. Nowakowski, K. P. Khemchandani, Phys. Rev. C70 (2004) 024601, arXiv:nucl-th/0405043.

[53-6]

Testing QM : the Uncertainty Principle, Jiri Soucek, arXiv:quant-ph/0404094, 2004.

[53-7]

Detector Efficiency Limits on Quantum Improvement, Deborah J. Jackson, George M. Hockney, arXiv:quant-ph/0402201, 2004.

[53-8]

Quantitative duality and neutral kaon interferometry in CPLEAR experiments, A. Bramon, G. Garbarino, B.C. Hiesmayr, Eur. Phys. J. C32 (2004) 377, arXiv:hep-ph/0307047.

[53-9]

Quantum marking and quantum erasure for neutral kaons, A. Bramon, G. Garbarino, B. Hiesmayr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 020405, arXiv:quant-ph/0306114.

[53-10]

Speed-up through entanglement - many-body effects in neutrino processes, Nicole F. Bell, Andrew A. Rawlinson, R. F. Sawyer, Phys. Lett. B573 (2003) 86, arXiv:hep-ph/0304082.

[53-11]

Decoherence, fluctuations and Wigner function in neutron optics, P. Facchi, A. Mariano, S. Pascazio, M. Suda, arXiv:quant-ph/0210088, 2002.

[53-12]

Multibarrier tunneling, S. Esposito, Phys. Rev. E67 (2003) 016609, arXiv:quant-ph/0209018.

[54-1]

CPT and Quantum Mechanics Tests with Kaons: Theory, Nick E. Mavromatos, arXiv:hep-ph/0607320, 2006. BEACH2006 Conference (Lancaster Univ., UK, July 2-8 2006).

[54-2]

Is the concept of quantum probability consistent with Lorentz covariance?, Y. S. Kim, Marilyn E. Noz, arXiv:quant-ph/0301155, 2003. Second International Conference on Foundations of Probability in Physics (Vaxjo, Sweden, June 2002).

[55-1]

Hidden evidence of non-exponential nuclear decay, Kelkar, N. G., Nowakowski, M., Khemchandani, K. P., Phys. Rev. C70 (2004) 024601, arXiv:nucl-th/0405043.

[55-2]

Nonexponential decay and the effective proton lifetime, Miglietta, F., Rimini, A., Phys. Lett. B139 (1984) 353-356.

[55-3]

The effective proton lifetime and nonexponential decay, Fleming, Gordon N., Phys. Lett. B125 (1983) 287.

[55-4]

On the proton decay, Fonda, L., Ghirardi, G. C., Weber, T., Phys. Lett. B131 (1983) 309.

[56-1]

Long time deviations from the exponential decay law: possible effects in particle physics and cosmology, K. Urbanowski, arXiv:1007.1742, 2010. XXII Recontres de Blois: Particle Physics and Cosmology, Blois, France, 15-20 July 2010.

[57-1]

Testing the Bell Inequality at Experiments of High Energy Physics, Xi-Qing Hao, Hong-Wei Ke, Yi-Bing Ding, Peng-Nian Shen, Xue-Qian Li, Chin. Phys. C (HEP & NP) 34 (2010) 311-318, arXiv:0904.1000.

[57-2]

Comments on 'An experimental test of non-local realism' by S. Groeblacher, T. Paterek, R. Kaltenbaek, C. Brukner, M. Zukowski, M. Aspelmeyer, and A. Zeilinger, Nature 446 (2007), 871-875, Stephen Parrott, arXiv:0707.3296, 2007.

[57-3]

Bell Inequalities in High Energy Physics, Yi-Bing Ding, Junli Li, Cong-Feng Qiao, arXiv:hep-ph/0702271, 2007.

[57-4]

Measurement of EPR-type flavour entanglement in Upsilon(4S)->B0 B0bar decays, A. Go et al., Belle Collaboration (Belle), Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 131802, arXiv:quant-ph/0702267.

[57-5]

Bell inequality with an arbitrary number of settings and its applications, Koji Nagata, Wieslaw Laskowski, Tomasz Paterek, arXiv:quant-ph/0601107, 2006.

[58-1]

Three different manifestations of the quantum Zeno effect, P. Facchi, S. Pascazio, arXiv:quant-ph/0303161, 2003.

[58-2]

Comment on 'Quantum Zeno effect', L.E. Ballentine, Phys. Rev. A43 (1991) 5165-5167.

[59-1]

Anthropic decision theory, Stuart Armstrong, arXiv:1110.6437, 2011.

[59-2]

Schrodinger's cat versus Darwin, Z.K. Silagadze, Electron. J. Theor. Phys. 7N24 (2010) 1-56, arXiv:0903.5539.

[59-3]

A Tempt To Measure Reality, Bhag C. Chauhan, arXiv:physics/0602051, 2006.

[59-4]

Philosophy Enters the Optics Laboratory: Bell's Theorem and its First Experimental Tests (1965-1982), Olival Freire Jr, arXiv:physics/0508180, 2005.

[59-5]

When champions meet: Rethinking the Bohr-Einstein debate, N.P. Landsman, arXiv:quant-ph/0507220, 2005.

[59-6]

Renninger"s Thought Experiment: Implications for Quantum Ontology and for Quantum Mechanic"s Interpretation, W. De Baere, arXiv:quant-ph/0504031, 2005.

[59-7]

Forms of Quantum Nonseparability and Related Philosophical Consequences, Vassilios Karakostas, arXiv:quant-ph/0502099, 2005.

[59-8]

Quantum Mechanics and Reality, Virendra Singh, arXiv:quant-ph/0412148, 2004.

[59-9]

Why the quantum?, Jeffrey Bub, arXiv:quant-ph/0402149, 2004.

[59-10]

Holism, Physical Theories and Quantum Mechanics, M.P. Seevinck, arXiv:quant-ph/0402047, 2004.

[59-11]

On the Work of Henry P. Stapp, Matthew J. Donald, arXiv:quant-ph/0311158, 2003.

[60-1]

Sir Arthur Eddington and the Foundations of Modern Physics, I. T. Durham, arXiv:quant-ph/0603146, 2006.

[60-2]

Einstein and the Quantum, Virendra Singh, arXiv:quant-ph/0510180, 2005.

[60-3]

From Einstein"s Theorem to Bell"s Theorem: A History of Quantum Nonlocality, H. M. Wiseman, arXiv:quant-ph/0509061, 2005.

[60-4]

The conservation laws in the field theoretical representation of Dirac's theory, Cornelius Lanczos, Z. Phys. 57 (1929) 474, arXiv:physics/0508013.

[60-5]

On the covariant formulation of Dirac's equation, Cornelius Lanczos, arXiv:physics/0508012, 2005.

[60-6]

Dirac's wave mechanical theory of the electron and its field theoretical interpretation, Cornelius Lanczos, Phys. Z. 31 (1930) 120, arXiv:physics/0508009. Lecture held at the meeting of the Berlin Physical Society, October 25, 1929.

[60-7]

Fermi, Majorana and the statistical model of atoms, E. Di Grezia, S. Esposito, Found. Phys. 34 (2004) 1431, arXiv:physics/0406030.

[60-8]

Einstein's Boxes, Travis Norsen, arXiv:quant-ph/0404016, 2004.

[60-9]

Understanding Heisenberg"s "Magical' Paper of July 1925: a New Look at the Calculational Details, Ian J. R. Aitchison, David A. MacManus, Thomas M. Snyder, arXiv:quant-ph/0404009, 2004.

[60-10]

Translation of Luders" "Uber die Zustandsanderung durch den Messprozess', K. A. Kirkpatrick, arXiv:quant-ph/0403007, 2004.

[60-11]

Pascual Jordan, glory and demise and his legacy in contemporary local quantum physics, Schroer, Bert, arXiv:hep-th/0303241, 2003.

[60-12]

The Feynman Path Integral: An Historical Slice, John R. Klauder, arXiv:quant-ph/0303034, 2003.

[60-13]

On the interpretation of quantum theory - from Copenhagen to the present day, Claus Kiefer, arXiv:quant-ph/0210152, 2002. Festschrift in honour of C.F. von Weizsaecker's 90th birthday.

[60-14]

Bohr's Conception of the Quantum Mechanical State of a System and Its Role in the Framework of Complementarity, Henry J. Folse, arXiv:quant-ph/0210075, 2002. "Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations," edited by A. Khrennikov.

[60-15]

Einstein and the quantum theory, Pais, A., Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 (1979) 861.

[61-1]

Majorana and the path-integral approach to Quantum Mechanics, S. Esposito, arXiv:physics/0603140, 2006. Centenary of the birth of Ettore Majorana.

[61-2]

Einstein's contributions to quantum theory, Norbert Straumann, arXiv:hep-ph/0508131, 2005. =Hadron Collider Physics Symposium (HCP2005) July 4-9 2005, Les Diablerets, Switzerland.

[61-3]

The Role of the Exclusion Principle for Atoms to Stars: A Historical Account, Norbert Straumann, arXiv:quant-ph/0403199, 2004. 12th Workshop on Nuclear Astrophysics, March 22-27, 2004, Ringberg Castle, Germany.

[61-4]

Copenhagen Computation: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Bohr, N. David Mermin, arXiv:quant-ph/0305088, 2003. Charles H. Bennett 60th Birthday Symposium, 8-9 May, 2003.

[61-5]

Einstein, Wigner, and Feynman: From E = mc^{2} to Feynman"s decoherence via Wigner"s little groups, Y. S. Kim, Acta Phys. Hung. A19 (2004) 317, arXiv:quant-ph/0304097. Wigner Centennial Conference, Pecs, Hungary (July 2002).

[62-1]

Representation-independent manipulations with Dirac spinors, Palash B. Pal, arXiv:physics/0703214, 2007.

[62-2]

How to Derive the Schrodinger Equation, David W. Ward, Sabine M. Volkmer, arXiv:physics/0610121, 2006.

[62-3]

Interpretation of Electron Tunneling from Uncertainty Principle, Angik Sarkar, T.K.Bhattacharyya, arXiv:quant-ph/0507239, 2005.

[62-4]

Conceptual and Epistemological discussions on Quantum Mechanics in a Virtual Laboratory, F. Ostermann, S.D. Prado, arXiv:physics/0507064, 2005.

[63-1]

Kindergarten Quantum Mechanics, Bob Coecke, arXiv:quant-ph/0510032, 2005. Quantum Information, Computation and Logic (Perimeter Institute), QTRF-III (Vaxjo), and Google (Silicon Valley) and Kestrel Institute (Silicon Valley).

[64-1]

Parallel Universes, Max Tegmark, arXiv:astro-ph/0302131, 2003.

[64-2]

100 years of the quantum, Tegmark, Max, Wheeler, John Archibald, Sci. Am. 284 (2001) 68-75, arXiv:quant-ph/0101077. An abbreviated version of this article, with much better graphic, was published in the February 2001 issue of Scientific American, p.68-75.

[64-3]

Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical, Zurek, Wojciech H., Phys. Today 44 (1991) 36-44.

Useful Links

Fraunhofer Quantum Computing Portal

Quantum Philosophy Theories

Quantum Mechanics of Atoms and Molecules

Advanced Quantum Mechanics II

Neutrino Unbound

String RegExp         Case Insensitive Case Sensitive