Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation with KamLAND: Evidence of Spectral Distortion - v3
(1 November 2004)
258 observed \bar\nu_e ->
\bar\nu_e events
 365.2 +- 23.7 expected events without oscillations
 17.8 +- 7.3 expected background events
disappearance confirmed at 99.998% C.L.
energy spectrum shows distorsions with 99.6% C.L.
best-fit of KamLAND data:  \Delta{m}^2 = 7.9 {}^{+0.6}_{-0.5} \times 10^{-5} \mathrm{eV}^2
best-fit of KamLAND + solar data:  \Delta{m}^2 = 7.9 {}^{+0.6}_{-0.5} \times 10^{-5} \mathrm{eV}^2 ,  \tan^2\theta = 0.40 {}^{+0.10}_{-0.07}
Prompt event energy spectrum of \bar\nu_e candidate events with associated background spectra. The shaded band indicates the systematic error in the best-fit reactor spectrum above 2.6 MeV. Ratio of the observed anti-neutrino spectrum to the expectation for no-oscillation versus \mathrm{L}_{0}/\mathrm{E}. The curves show the expectation for the best-fit oscillation, best-fit decay and best-fit decoherence models taking into account the individual time-dependent flux variations of all reactors and detector effects. The data points and models are plotted with \mathrm{L}_{0}=180\mathrm{km}, as if all anti-neutrinos detected in KamLAND were due to a single reactor at this distance.
Neutrino oscillation parameter allowed region from KamLAND anti-neutrino data (shaded regions) and solar neutrino experiments (lines) [nucl-ex/0309004]. Result of a combined two-neutrino oscillation analysis of KamLAND and the observed solar neutrino fluxes under the assumption of CPT invariance. The fit gives  \Delta{m}^2 = 7.9 {}^{+0.6}_{-0.5} \times 10^{-5} \mathrm{eV}^2 and  \tan^2\theta = 0.40 {}^{+0.10}_{-0.07} including the allowed 1-sigma parameter range.


Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation with KamLAND: Evidence of Spectral Distortion
(13 June 2004)
see also: G. Gratta, Results from the KamLAND experiment, Neutrino 2004
258 observed \bar\nu_e ->
\bar\nu_e events
 365.2 +- 23.7 expected events without oscillations
 7.5 +- 1.3 expected background events
disappearance confirmed at 99.995% C.L.
energy spectrum shows distorsions with 99.9% C.L.
best-fit of KamLAND data:  \Delta{m}^2 = 8.3 \times 10^{-5} \mathrm{eV}^2 ,  \tan^2\theta = 0.41
best-fit of KamLAND + solar data:  \Delta{m}^2 = 8.2 {}^{+0.6}_{-0.5} \times 10^{-5} \mathrm{eV}^2 ,  \tan^2\theta = 0.40 {}^{+0.09}_{-0.07}
Prompt event energy spectrum of the \bar\nu_e candidate events along with the spectrum of accidental backgrounds. The shaded band indicates the systematic error in the best-fit reactor spectrum above 2.6 MeV. Ratio of the observed anti-neutrino spectrum to the expectation for no-oscillation versus \mathrm{L}_{0}/\mathrm{E}. The curves show the expectation for the best-fit oscillation, best-fit decay and best-fit decoherence models taking into account the individual time-dependent flux variations of all reactors and detector effects. The data points and models are plotted with \mathrm{L}_{0}=180\mathrm{km}, as if all anti-neutrinos detected in KamLAND were due to a single reactor at this distance.
Allowed regions of neutrino oscillation parameters from KamLAND anti-neutrino data (shaded regions) and solar neutrino experiments (lines) [nucl-ex/0309004]. Result of a combined two-neutrino oscillation analysis of KamLAND and the observed solar neutrino fluxes under the assumption of CPT invariance. The best-fit point is  \Delta{m}^2 = 8.2 {}^{+0.6}_{-0.5} \times 10^{-5} \mathrm{eV}^2 and  \tan^2\theta = 0.40 {}^{+0.09}_{-0.07} including the allowed 1-sigma parameter range.


String RegExp         Case Insensitive Case Sensitive
       


We Can Put an End to Word Attachments


Authors:
Carlo Giunti / giunti@to.infn.it
Marco Laveder / marco.laveder@pd.infn.it
Last Update: Wed 11 Apr 2012, day 102 of the year 2012, 14:49:31 UTC